Observing Interviewees' Inner Self: How Authenticity Cues in Job Interviews Relate to Interview and Job Performance

Anna Luca Heimann,Annika Schmitz-Wilhelmy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09949-4

IF: 6.604

2024-05-09

Journal of Business and Psychology

Abstract:Job interviews are among the most popular selection methods. Previous research suggests that interviewees who are perceived as being authentic are evaluated more favorably in job interviews. However, little is known about which behavioral cues elicit perceptions of authenticity in others and whether interviewees who exhibit such authenticity cues are more likely to perform better in the job interview and on their actual job. Drawing from person perception theories, the purpose of this study is to introduce the concept of authenticity cues to interview research and to examine the extent to which authenticity cues are related to (a) raters' perceptions of interviewee authenticity, (b) interviewer ratings of interview performance, and (c) supervisor ratings of job performance. We used video recordings from 181 employed individuals participating in a mock interview to observe and rate interviewees' authenticity cues. Results indicate that observers can distinguish between verbal and para/nonverbal authenticity cues and that both verbal and para/nonverbal cues influence the extent to which interviewees are perceived as authentic by independent raters. Moreover, we found that interviewees' para/nonverbal authenticity cues were particularly relevant to predicting interview performance, whereas only verbal authenticity cues were related to job performance. In our analyses, we further considered the role of first impressions in the interview, interviewees' verbal cognitive ability, and interviewees' extraversion. Implications for theories of person perception, authenticity research, and interview practice are discussed.

psychology, applied,business

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the relationship between authenticity cues in job interviews and interview and job performance. The researchers propose that although it is recommended for job seekers to display their authentic selves during interviews to receive better evaluations, there is insufficient research on which specific behaviors evoke perceptions of authenticity and whether these behaviors enhance interview and job performance. Starting from the theory of personality perception, they define authenticity cues as including verbal, paraverbal, and nonverbal behaviors, and evaluate these cues through the observation of video recordings of 181 employed participants in simulated interviews.

The study found that observers were able to distinguish between verbal and nonverbal authenticity cues, and both cues influenced independent evaluators' perceptions of interviewees' authenticity. Additionally, nonverbal authenticity cues were particularly important in predicting interview performance, while only verbal authenticity cues were related to job performance. The study also considered factors such as first impressions, interviewees' verbal cognitive ability, and extraversion.

The main contribution of the paper lies in introducing the concept of authenticity cues into interview research and examining the associations between these cues, perceived authenticity of interviewees, interview performance, and job performance. The research findings are important for understanding how authenticity is presented in interviews and the processes of interview evaluation and recruitment decision-making.