De Novo Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for l -Proline Production

Jiao Zhang,Fenghui Qian,Feng Dong,Qingzhuo Wang,Junjie Yang,Yu Jiang,Sheng Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00249
IF: 5.249
2020-07-06
ACS Synthetic Biology
Abstract:<span><span class="smallcaps smallerCapital">l</span>-Proline is an important amino acid that has various industrial applications. Industrial <span class="smallcaps smallerCapital">l</span>-proline-producing strains are obtained by the mutagenesis of <i>Corynebacterium glutamicum</i>. In this study, the optimized <i>C. glutamicum</i> genome-editing tools were further applied in the <i>de novo</i> construction of a hyper-<span class="smallcaps smallerCapital">l</span>-proline-producing strain. Overexpression of a feedback inhibition-resistant γ-glutamic kinase mutant ProBG149K, deletion of a proline dehydrogenase to block <span class="smallcaps smallerCapital">l</span>-proline degradation, overexpression of glutamate dehydrogenase to increase glutamate synthesis flux, the mutation of 6-phosphate gluconate dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase in the pentose phosphate pathway to enhance NADPH supply, the deletion of pyruvate aminotransferase to decrease the byproduct <span class="smallcaps smallerCapital">l</span>-alanine synthesis, and weakening of α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase to regulate the TCA cycle were combined to obtain ZQJY-9. ZQJY-9 produced 19.68 ± 0.22 g/L of <span class="smallcaps smallerCapital">l</span>-proline in flask fermentation and was also demonstrated at the 3 L bioreactor level by fed-batch fermentation producing 120.18 g/L of <span class="smallcaps smallerCapital">l</span>-proline at 76 h with the highest productivity of 1.581 g/L/h.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00249?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00249</a>.Figure S1: Selection of different CEPs in <i>C. glutamicum</i>. Figure S2: Point mutation, gene deletion, and insertion efficiency of 7 CEPs assisted the CRISPR system. Figure S3: PCR validation of colonies of gene deletion and insertion experiments obtained by the traditional SacB system, CRISPR-<i>Fn</i>Cpf1 system, or SacB-assisted CRISPR-<i>Fn</i>Cpf1 system. Figure S4: PCR validation of colonies of gene deletion and insertion experiments obtained by the SacB-assisted CRISPR-<i>Fn</i>Cpf1 or SacB-assisted CRISPR-<i>Bb</i>Cpf1 system. Figure S5: Colonies of gene deletion and insertion on BHISG-Kan obtained by the SacB-assisted CRISPR-<i>Fn</i>Cpf1 or SacB-assisted CRISPR-<i>Bb</i>Cpf1 system. Table S1: Overview of transformation and gene editing efficiency <i>via</i> the CRISPR-Cas system in <i>C. glutamicum</i>. Table S2: Overview of transformation and gene editing efficiency <i>via</i> the CRISPR-<i>Fn</i>Cpf1 and CRISPR-<i>Bb</i>Cpf1 system in <i>C. glutamicum</i>. Table S3: Mutation efficiency of <i>putA, gnd</i>, and <i>gdh</i> in ZQJY-1 (pK18<i>mobsacB</i>-spec-p<i>eftu</i>-<i>gdh</i>). Table S4: Mutation efficiency of <i>putA</i>, <i>gnd</i>, and <i>gdh</i> in ZQJY-1. Table S5: 31 oligonucleotides for RBS replacement. Table S6: Sequence of special RBS mutation type. Table S7: <span class="smallcaps smallerCapital">l</span>-proline fermentation of randomly picked colonies from the RBS engineering library. Table S8: Fermentation of <span class="smallcaps smallerCapital">l</span>-proline overproducing strains. Table S9: Strains and plasmids used in this study. Table S10 Primers used in this study to construct plasmids. Table S11: Plasmids used as the template for CEP amplification (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00249/suppl_file/sb0c00249_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.</span>
biochemical research methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?