Abstract:According to Fillmore (1982) and Lakoff (1987), folk theories such as pragmatic experience and cultural knowledge about the world can be theoretically captured as frames (Fillmore) and ICMs (Lakoff) and may not look strictly scientific. However, as ICM successfully incorporates both denotational and representational sides of meaning, it may well help to depict some language phenomena which cannot be fully described within formal approaches. In this paper, therefore, we argue that semiotic relationship may not be totally objective. Ontological entities (O) may not be directly mapped epistemologically onto the symbolic system in the form of E but may rather give rise to corresponding ECs as organic combinations of epistemological counterpart of O and cognitive factors such as imagination, image schema, etc. We believe that this way of theorization enjoys priority over formal approaches in analyzing zero subject (○) phenomenon in Chinese. Furthermore, ○ can be subcategorized into ○e type (zero exophora) and ○a type (zero anaphora). These are different from empty syntactic categories such as e, t, pro and PRO. In linguistic literature, zero anaphora is usually studied in a [Xr ← A] framework. Yet, zero anaphora in general and first person zero anaphora in particular in Chinese boasts of a number of other analytic possibilities such as [Xr ← ○a],[○e← ○a], etc. and the length of the chain could be excessively great. This gives rise to an A model (anaphoric), a B model (inferential) and a C model (grammatical) in the description of the ○ phenomenon. An investigation shows that C model seems to be the most prototypical. That is, if an ICM is constructed to analyze the ○ phenomenon, we may find that [○] is more prototypical than [我], [自己], etc. And the ICM can equally depict C model as more prototypical than both A model and B model, put against data of the same nature. This is so simply because in the process of grammatical fossilization of the phenomenon, CC (cognitive factors) holds sway (rather than physical contextual factors (PC) or linguistic contextual factors (LC)), and some ideological content (e.g. Im) may enter the semantic domain of ○ with the lapse of time and thus produce a ○/Im parasitic cognitive unit.

Iconicity and viewpoint: Antonym order in Chinese four-character patterns

The Image Iconicity in the Chinese Language

Contrastive Study of the Syntactic-Semantic Structures Between English-Chinese Middles

Donkey Pronouns in Child Mandarin: Insights into the ∃/∀ Dichotomy

Iconicity of simple Chinese characters

A Semiotic and Cognitive Analysis of Chinese Iconic Signs1

The Chinese-English Translation of Four-character Pattern from the Perspective of Functional Equivalence Theory

Adnominal Constructions in Modern Chinese and Their Distribution Properties

An ICM Approach to(Chinese)Zero Subject

A COGNITIVE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF THE POLYSEMY OF THE CHARACTER SHÀNG上“ON/OVER” IN MANDARIN CHINESE

Hidden iconicity: A Peircean perspective on the Chinese picto-phonetic sign

Studies in the Phonetic Iconicity of Chinese Demonstratives Across Dialects (part Ⅱ)

A Semiotic Study Of The Idiosyncratic "Chi

Are tones in the expressive lexicon iconic? Evidence from three Chinese languages

An analysis of the prototypicality of ditransitive constructions in English and Chinese

On the Cognitive Significance of Antithesis in Chinese Writing

Study on English Translation of Chinese Quantifiers from the Perspective of Cognitive Iconicity: A Pilot Study

A Common Construction Pattern Of English Words And Chinese Characters

"Synonymy with Different Sequence" and "synonymy with Isomerism"in the Modern Chinese Vocabulary on the Two Sides of Taiwan Straits