No false negative paradox in STEMI-NSTEMI diagnosis

José Nunes de Alencar,H Pendell Meyers,Jesse T T McLaren,Stephen W Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324512
IF: 5.7
2024-10-11
Heart
Abstract:Introduction ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnosis is based on a clinical presentation and ST-segment elevation (STE) in at least two consecutive leads. Despite being deeply rooted in both the literature and in current medical knowledge and having been pivotal in advancing reperfusion therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), the diagnosis of STEMI presents a significant issue: What we, the authors, call the 'no false negative paradox'. This paradox potentially makes it challenging to recognise a false negative diagnosis of STEMI and makes it difficult to appreciate the significance of an acute coronary occlusion (ACO) that could benefit from early reperfusion in door-to-needle or door-to-balloon times despite the absence of STE.1 This paradox stems from the incorporation bias and feedback sanction bias detailed in subsequent paragraphs. This is an opinion paper where the patient and the public were not involved. The incorporation...
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?