Association between past exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and peptic ulcer: A cross-sectional study in eastern China

Zhebin Yu,Xinli Mao,Mengling Tang,Yi Chen,Mengyin Wu,Mingjuan Jin,Jianbing Wang,Lei Xu,Guoliang Ye,Jin Ding,Bin Ye,Dongya Chen,Yu Chen,Xia Chen,Xiancang Sheng,Hongzhang Li,Qiang Chen,Xiaosheng Teng,Qiulong Ding,Haideng Yang,Zhe Shen,Kun Chen,Chaohui Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128706
IF: 8.8
2021-02-01
Chemosphere
Abstract:Ambient fine particulate matter (particle diameter &lt; 2.5 μm, or PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is a major public health concern in China. Exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> has been associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes. The current study aimed to estimate the association between exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and the risk of peptic ulcer diseases (PUDs). We conducted a hospital-based cross-sectional study of seven major cities in Zhejiang Province, China (combined population &gt; 57 million people), which included a total of 647,092 subjects who underwent gastroscopy examination (86,852 subjects were diagnosed with PUDs) recorded in 13 large hospitals from 2014 to 2018. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PUDs, including duodenal ulcers (DUs) and gastric ulcers (GUs). The overall estimated OR (95% CI) associated with every 10-μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in the 1-month average PM<sub>2.5</sub> before the detection of PUDs was 1.050 (95% CI: 1.038, 1.063). The association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration and the prevalence of PUDs tended to be attenuated but remained significant when considering different exposure periods (OR = 1.030, 95% CI = 1.018-1.043 for the 3-month moving average; OR = 1.020, 95% CI = 1.005-1.037 for the 6-month moving average). Stronger associations were observed for DUs than GUs. The observed positive association of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure with PUDs remained significant in the two-pollutant models after adjusting for other air pollutants. Our findings could provide scientific evidence for a more general adverse role of air pollution on PUDs.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?