Clinical outcomes and learning curve of Tip‐in endoscopic mucosal resection for 15–25 mm colorectal neoplasms among non‐experts

Kohei Shigeta,Yoshihiro Kishida,Kinichi Hotta,Kenichiro Imai,Sayo Ito,Kazunori Takada,Junya Sato,Tatsunori Minamide,Yoichi Yamamoto,Masao Yoshida,Yuki Maeda,Noboru Kawata,Hirotoshi Ishiwatari,Hiroyuki Matsubayashi,Hiroyuki Ono
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16575
2024-04-24
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Abstract:Background and Aim Tip‐in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has a high en bloc resection rate for large colorectal neoplasms. However, non‐experts' performance in Tip‐in EMR has not been investigated. We investigated whether Tip‐in EMR can be achieved effectively and safely even by non‐experts. Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent Tip‐in EMR for 15–25 mm colorectal nonpedunculated neoplasms at a Japanese tertiary cancer center between January 2014 and December 2020. Baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, learning curve of non‐experts, and risk factors of failing self‐achieved en bloc resection were analyzed. Results A total of 597 lesions were analyzed (438 by experts and 159 by non‐experts). The self‐achieved en bloc resection (69.8% vs 88.6%, P 10 cases. Adverse event (P = 0.165) and local recurrence (P = 0.892) rates were not significantly different between experts and non‐experts. Risk factors of failing self‐achieved en bloc resection were non‐polypoid morphology (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.6–7.3, P = 0.001), lesions with an underlying semilunar fold (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.6–7.3, P
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?