Maize/soybean intercropping increases nutrient uptake, crop yield and modifies soil physio-chemical characteristics and enzymatic activities in the subtropical humid region based in Southwest China
Jamal Nasar,Munir Ahmad,Harun Gitari,Li Tang,Yuan Chen,Xun-Bo Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05061-0
IF: 5.26
2024-05-23
BMC Plant Biology
Abstract:Intercropping, a widely adopted agricultural practice worldwide, aims to increase crop yield, enhance plant nutrient uptake, and optimize the utilization of natural resources, contributing to sustainable farming practices on a global scale. However, the underlying changes in soil physio-chemical characteristics and enzymatic activities, which contribute to crop yield and nutrient uptake in the intercropping systems are largely unknown. Consequently, a two-year (2021–2022) field experiment was conducted on the maize/soybean intercropping practices with/without nitrogen (N) fertilization (i.e., N 0 ; 0 N kg ha −1 and N 1 ; 225 N kg ha −1 for maize and 100 N kg ha −1 for soybean ) to know whether such cropping system can improve the nutrients uptake and crop yields, soil physio-chemical characteristics, and soil enzymes, which ultimately results in enhanced crop yield. The results revealed that maize intercropping treatments (i.e., N 0 MI and N 1 MI) had higher crop yield, biomass dry matter, and 1000-grain weight of maize than mono-cropping treatments (i.e., N 0 MM, and N 1 MM). Nonetheless, these parameters were optimized in N 1 MI treatments in both years. For instance, N 1 MI produced the maximum grain yield (10,105 and 11,705 kg ha −1 ), biomass dry matter (13,893 and 14,093 kg ha −1 ), and 1000-grain weight (420 and 449 g) of maize in the year 2021 and 2022, respectively. Conversely, soybean intercropping treatments (i.e., N 0 SI and N 1 SI) reduced such yield parameters for soybean. Also, the land equivalent ratio (LER) and land equivalent ratio for N fertilization (LER N ) values were always greater than 1, showing the intercropping system's benefits in terms of yield and improved resource usage. Moreover, maize intercropping treatments (i.e., N 0 MI and N 1 MI) and soybean intercropping treatments (i.e., N 0 SI and N 1 SI) significantly ( p < 0.05) enhanced the nutrient uptake (i.e., N, P, K, Ca, Fe, and Zn) of maize and soybean, however, these nutrients uptakes were more prominent in N 1 MI and N 1 SI treatments of maize and soybean, respectively in both years (2021 and 2022) compared with their mono-cropping treatments. Similarly, maize-soybean intercropping treatments (i.e., N 0 MSI and N 1 MSI) significantly ( p < 0.05) improved the soil-based N, P, K, NH 4 , NO 3 , and soil organic matter, but, reduced the soil pH. Such maize-soybean intercropping treatments also improved the soil enzymatic activities such as protease (PT), sucrose (SC), acid phosphatase (AP), urease (UE), and catalase (CT) activities. This indicates that maize-soybean intercropping could potentially contribute to higher and better crop yield, enhanced plant nutrient uptake, improved soil nutrient pool, physio-chemical characteristics, and related soil enzymatic activities. Thus, preferring intercropping to mono-cropping could be a preferable choice for ecologically viable agricultural development.
plant sciences