Abstract:The UK Government is hosting COP26 in Glasgow between 31st October and 12th November 2021. It plans to make progress in four key areas which summarize as ‘coal, cars, cash and trees’ (Carbon Brief, 2021). The first two of these aims— to get agreement for the rapid phase out of coal, the most polluting of fossil fuels, and to ensure a rapid transition away for cars fuelled by fossil fuels— are very important, but are not directly related to the remit of Global Change Biology. The latter two aims— ensuring that the financial support of $100 billion per year promised in 2010 by wealthy countries to developing countries finally gets delivered and ensuring that climate solutions adopted also codeliver to nature— are squarely within the remit of Global Change Biology. With respect to the ‘cash’ aim, this flow of finance is essential to allow poorer countries to adapt to, and to mitigate, climate change. We know that a vast proportion of the potential for natural climate solutions is located in the developing world (Griscom et al., 2020), so if we are to realize that global potential, developing countries must have the financial backing to ensure that this happens in an equitable and just way. Not all of this cash will be used for naturebased solutions, of course, but a proportion of it will be, and naturebased solutions would almost certainly not happen at the scale and speed required to help us meet net zero greenhouse gas emissions targets without this cash. With respect to the ‘trees’ aim, the first thing to note is that naturebased solutions are about so much more than just planting trees (Seddon et al., 2021)! ‘Trees’ is just shorthand for naturebased solutions, but the broad variety of naturebased solutions available, beyond just tree planting, must be encouraged at COP26. The recent joint workshop report by IPBES and IPCC (Pörtner et al., 2021) demonstrated that we cannot successfully resolve either of the existential threats of climate change or biodiversity loss unless we tackle them both together. Mainstreaming nature into our thinking on climate action is essential, so encouraging all countries to include naturebased solutions in their nationally determined contributions to meet the goal of the Paris Agreement will be the first step in formalizing these considerations. But not all greenhouse gas removal options available on land or in the oceans constitute naturebased solutions— naturebased solutions must also provide benefits to human wellbeing and biodiversity— so the way in which they are implemented is crucial. Parties to the COP should be encouraged to adopt international guidelines for naturebased solutions, such as those provided by IUCN (2021), or those suggested by the NatureBased Solutions Initiative (NBSI, 2021), which are as follows: • Naturebased solutions are not a substitute for the rapid phaseout of fossil fuels and must not delay urgent action to decarbonize our economies. • Naturebased solutions involve the protection, restoration and/ or management of a wide range of natural and seminatural ecosystems on land and in the sea; the sustainable management of aquatic systems and working lands; or the creation of novel ecosystems in and around cities or across the wider landscape. • Naturebased solutions are designed, implemented, managed and monitored by or in partnership with Indigenous peoples and local communities through a process that fully respects and champions local rights and knowledge, and generates local benefits. • Naturebased solutions support or enhance biodiversity, that is, the diversity of life from the level of the gene to the level of the ecosystem.

Global evidence of human well-being and biodiversity impacts of natural climate solutions

A global evidence map of human well-being and biodiversity co-benefits and trade-offs of natural climate solutions

Co‐benefits of and trade‐offs between natural climate solutions and Sustainable Development Goals

Global recognition of the importance of nature-based solutions to the impacts of climate change

What evidence exists on the links between natural climate solutions and climate change mitigation outcomes in subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions? A systematic map protocol

Existing evidence on the effect of urban forest management in carbon solutions and avian conservation: a systematic literature map

The impact of interventions in the global land and agri-food sectors on Nature's Contributions to People and the UN Sustainable Development Goals

Assessing evidence on the impacts of nature-based interventions for climate change mitigation: a systematic map of primary and secondary research from subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions

Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges

A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change

What evidence exists regarding the impact of biodiversity on human health and well-being? A systematic map protocol

Essential Outcomes for COP26

Improving uptake of evidence on jobs from greening

An attainable global vision for conservation and human well-being

Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world

The principles of natural climate solutions

From Forests to Oceans: Exploring the Interconnected Influences of Climate Change on Ecosystems, Communities, and the Path to Sustainability

Ten New Insights in Climate Science 2024

Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice

Understanding the role of biodiversity in the climate, food, water, energy, transport and health nexus in Europe

Solution to what? Global assessment of nature-based solutions, urban challenges, and outcomes