Abstract:SAC decompression increases the risk of POSS compared with the normal group after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, orthopedic surgeons should consider the individual clinical data and goals of each patient when making decisions about surgical procedures. Objective The sub‐acromioclavicular (SAC) decompression is often performed during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, the impact of SAC decompression on patients with postoperative shoulder stiffness (POSS) are controversial and unclear. This study is aim to evaluate the impact of additional sub‐acromioclavicular (SAC) decompression during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on the postoperative shoulder stiffness (POSS) in patients. Methods This retrospective study examined digital data from patients with full‐thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at a local institution. Patient‐reported outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, the University of California–Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Restricted shoulder mobility occurring within 6 months postoperatively, lasting more than 12 weeks, characterized by a passive forward flexion angle of <120° or an external rotation angle of <30°, with or without associated shoulder pain was identified as POSS. Factors affecting POSS were analyzed by binary logistic regression analysis. The patient‐reported outcomes scores were analyzed by generalized estimating equations to examine the impact of SAC decompression. Results A total of 155 patients met the set criteria and were included in the study. The analysis of binary logistic regression showed that diabetes (p = 0.001) and SAC decompression (p = 0.003) were independent factors for POSS. In the analysis of each follow‐up point, only at the 3‐month follow‐up, the ASES scores (p = 0.003), UCLA scores (p = 0.045), and VAS scores (p = 0.005) showed significant differences between the SAC decompression group and the non‐decompression group. For the intergroup comparison, the results showed a significant difference in the ASES scores (β = −4.971, p = 0.008), UCLA scores (β = −1.524, p = 0.019), and VAS scores (β = 0.654, p = 0.010) throughout the study duration between the SAC decompression group and the non‐decompression group. Conclusion The findings of this study suggested that SAC decompression during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair increase the risk of POSS compared with those without the decompression, which indicate surgeons do not perform SAC decompression unless necessary.

Incidence and risk factors for shoulder stiffness after open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a rehabilitation problem or a surgical indication?

Early Postoperative Stiffness in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Association with Preoperative Functional Scores, Pain Levels, and One-Year Outcomes -Rotator cuff repair prognosis with stiffness and pain-

Incidence and risk factors for early postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients without preoperative stiffness

The Incidence of Postoperative Shoulder Stiffness After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review

Early postoperative pain as a risk factor of shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Prognostic factors for the occurrence of post-operative shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

Prediction of Shoulder Stiffness After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Supraspinatus Muscle and Tendon Stiffness Changes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Shear Wave Elastography Assessment

Time-course changes in active stiffness of the supraspinatus muscle after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Early rehabilitation affects functional outcomes and activities of daily living after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a case report

Risk factors affecting rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair: a meta-analysis and systematic review

A Systematic Temporal Assessment of Changes in Tendon Stiffness Following Rotator Cuff Repair

Clinical Problems of Structural Failure after Rotator Cuff Repairs

Retear after Rotator Cuff Repair

Functional and Structural Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections

Sub‐Acromioclavicular Decompression Increases the Risk of Postoperative Shoulder Stiffness after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Socioeconomic and Other Risk Factors for Retear after Arthroscopic Surgery for Nontraumatic Rotator Cuff Tear

Clinical outcome of arthroscopic acromioplasty vs. arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for irreparable rotator cuff tears: A3-year follow-up

Determinants of Patient-Rated Benefit 6 Months Post Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: An Analysis of 2010 Patients

Are Lower Passive Anterior Elevation and External Rotation at 6 Weeks Postoperatively Associated With Healing of Isolated Arthroscopic Supraspinatus Repairs?