Comparative Outcomes of Anticoagulation Alone Versus Anticoagulation plus Endovascular Intervention in Adults with Isolated Renal Vein Thrombosis

Linfeng Zhang,Chong Li,Zhaohui Hua,Peng Xu,Zhouyang Jiao,Hui Cao,Shirui Liu,Chunguang Guo,Zhen Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.03.019
2023-04-16
Abstract:Background and Objective There are limited therapeutic strategies for adults with isolated renal vein thrombosis (RVT). Herein, this study explores and compares the efficacy of anticoagulation alone versus anticoagulation plus endovascular intervention in the treatment of this rare disease. Materials and Methods This study analyzed the clinical data of RVT patients who were treated in a tertiary referral center in urban China from April 2012 to April 2022. These patients were classified into anticoagulation (best medical treatment [BMT]) and endovascular intervention (endovascular-based treatment [EBT]) groups. Next, primary endpoints including thrombus clearance and renal function changes were evaluated by measuring serum creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rates (GFR). Results Forty consecutive patients with RVT (25 males and 15 females) were included in this study, with a median age of 37 years (18-72 years). Some patients developed symptoms, including 12 patients with low back pain (30%), 11 patients with lower extremity edema (28%), and 10 patients with abdominal pain (30%). Nephrotic syndrome was the underlying etiology in most patients (30/40, 75%). Additionally, 28 patients (70%) suffered from unilateral RVT, including 18 cases (45%) of left RVT. The included patients consisted of 17 patients receiving BMT (42%) and 23 patients receiving EBT (58%). In the acute phase of RVT, which was defined as less than 14 days from symptom onset, the EBT group had higher thrombus clearance and better improvement of creatinine and GFR after treatment than the BMT group ( P < 0.05). In the subacute phase, which referred to 14-30 days from symptom onset, thrombus clearance was higher in the EBT group than in the BMT group ( P < 0.05), whereas the improvement of creatinine and GFR were insignificantly different between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusions The etiologies of RVT can and should be investigated. In the study center, RVT was primarily caused by nephrotic syndrome in young patients and also was attributed to malignancy and lupus. In addition to anticoagulation, endovascular intervention including catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy contributed to the improvement of renal function in patients with acute RVT. Meanwhile, endovascular intervention markedly promoted the thrombus clearance of patients in the subacute phase but did not improve renal function. Therefore, endovascular intervention should be considered if RVT is diagnosed in the acute phase.
surgery,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?