Hemodynamic profile of cirrhotic patients with sepsis and septic shock: A propensity score matched case-control study

Jee Young You,Ryota Sato,Sanchit Chawla,Aanchal Kapoor,Xiaofeng Wang,Patrick Collier,Georg Auzinger,Abhijit Duggal,Siddharth Dugar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154532
IF: 4.298
2024-02-10
Journal of Critical Care
Abstract:Purpose Our understanding of hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients with sepsis remains limited. Our study aims to investigate differences in hemodynamic profiles using echocardiography between septic patients with and without cirrhosis. Materials and methods This is a single-center, retrospective study of septic patients with echocardiogram within 3 days of ICU admission. We compared baseline characteristics, echocardiographic markers of LV systolic function arterial load between patients with and without cirrhosis. A propensity score-matched case-control model was developed to describe the differences in those echocardiography derived parameters between the groups. Results 3151 patients with sepsis were included of which 422 (13%) had cirrhosis. In the propensity score matched group with 828 patients, cirrhotic patients had significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (64 vs.56%, p < 0.001) and stroke volume (72 vs.48 ml, p < 0.001) along with lower arterial elastance (Ea) (1.35 1vs.20.3, p < 0.001) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (851 vs.1209 dynes/s/m −5 , p = 0.001). The left ventricular elastance (Ees) (2.83 vs 2.45, p = 0.002) was higher and ventricular-arterial coupling (Ea/Ees) (0.48 vs. 0.86, p < 0.001) lower in cirrhotic compared to non-cirrhotic. Conclusions Septic patients with cirrhosis had higher LVEF with lower Ea and SVR with higher Ees and significantly lower Ea/Ees suggesting vasodilation as the principal driver of the hyperdynamic profile in cirrhosis.
critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?