Abstract:Atmospheric correction of airborne hyperspectral imaging spectroscopy (AHIS) to obtain high-quality surface reflectance is the prerequisite for remote sensing applications. Over the last decades, different atmospheric correction methods have been developed based on radiative transfer models (RTMs), however, the relative performances of different algorithms are unclear. Automated operational atmospheric correction methods to process large-volume AHIS data in a high-accurate and high-throughput manner are still lacking. Therefore, this study proposed an operational atmospheric correction pipeline for deriving surface reflectance from AHIS data. To ensure the accuracy and efficiency of the pipeline, we focused on three specific aspects: (1) selecting a suitable RTM for the development of atmospheric lookup tables (LUTs) by comparing the commercial MODerate resolution atmospheric TRANsmission (MODTRAN) and open-sourced Library for Radiative TRANsfer (LibRadTRAN) models, where the widely-used software, Atmospheric/Topographic Correction for Airborne Imagery (ATCOR), was used as benchmarks; (2) identifying key atmospheric correction parameters and determining suitable sources for parameter retrievals including AHIS, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET); and (3) testing the performance of using machine learning emulators to speed up the RTM-based atmospheric correction. Results indicate that (1) atmospheric correction based on MODTRAN LUTs can produce surface reflectance accurately with mean absolute errors 0.98 compared to field measurements, which is comparable to the software ATCOR and slightly outperforms the LibRadTRAN LUTs; (2) sobol global sensitivity analysis demonstrates that in the atmospheric correction, visibility and water vapor are two key parameters that can be accurately derived from AHIS in contrast to MODIS or AERONET data; and (3) Random Forest emulators can produce accurate estimations of surface reflectance with mean absolute errors 0.98 for higher processing efficiency and determine a suitable set of wavelengths for retrieving atmospheric visibility and water vapor. The proposed atmospheric correction pipeline also improved the four-stream radiative transfer theory for airborne applications by considering adjacent effects from airborne surrounding pixels and can also be applied for atmospheric correction of hyperspectral data from spaceborne missions.

Correction: Begouen Demeaux, C.; Boss, E. Validation of Remote-Sensing Algorithms for Diffuse Attenuation of Downward Irradiance Using BGC-Argo Floats. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4500

Correction: Hui, Y., et al. Spatio-Temporal Validation of AIRS CO2 Observations Using GAW, HIPPO and TCCON. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3583

Correction: Sun et al. A Method to Estimate Clear-Sky Albedo of Paddy Rice Fields. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5185

Correction: Zhang et al. Evaluation of the Radiometric Calibration of ZY1-02E Thermal Infrared Data. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3905

Correction: Shupeng, W., et al. Carbon Dioxide Retrieval from TanSat Observations and Validation with TCCON Measurements. Remote Sensing 2020, 12(14), 2204

Algorithms to retrieve the spectral diffuse attenuation coefficient of light in the ocean from remote sensing

Erratum: Wang, Q.; Ni-Meister, W. Forest Canopy Height and Gaps from Multiangular BRDF, Assessed with Airborne LiDAR Data (Short Title: Vegetation Structure from Lidar and Multiangular Data). Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2566

Correction: Wang et al. Increased Compound Droughts and Heatwaves in a Double Pack in Central Asia. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2959

Validation of Regularized Retrieval Algorithm for Clear-Sky Land Surface Albedo with Multi-Angular POLDER Data

Algorithm of Additional Correction of Level 2 Remote Sensing Reflectance Data Using Modelling of the Optical Properties of the Black Sea Waters

Corrigendum to “A neural network model for remote sensing of diffuse attenuation coefficient in global oceanic and coastal waters: Exemplifying the applicability of the model to the coastal regions in Eastern China Seas” [Remote Sensing of Environment, 148 168–177]

Correction: Ebrahimi, A.; Czarnuch, S. Automatic Super-Surface Removal in Complex 3D Indoor Environments Using Iterative Region-Based RANSAC. Sensors 2021, 21, 3724

Correction: Lin, Y., Et Al. Road Extraction from Very-High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images Via a Nested SE-Deeplab Model. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2985

Correction: Wang et al. Quantifying the Source Attribution of PM10 Measured Downwind of the Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 718

Erratum: Lou, X.; Jia, Z.; Yang, J.; Kasabov, N. Change Detection in SAR Images Based on the ROF Model Semi-Implicit Denoising Method. Sensors 2019, 19, 1179

Erratum: the Role of Satellite Remote Sensing in Climate Change Studies

Correction: Wang et al. ShuffleCloudNet: A Lightweight Composite Neural Network-Based Method for Cloud Computation in Remote-Sensing Images. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5258

Atmospheric correction of absorbing aerosols for satellite ocean color remote sensing over coastal waters

Corrigendum to "integration of Remote Sensing Data and Surface Observations to Estimate the Impact of the Russian Wildfires over Europe and Asia During August 2010" Published in Biogeosciences, 8, 3771–3791, 2011

Towards operational atmospheric correction of airborne hyperspectral imaging spectroscopy: Algorithm evaluation, key parameter analysis, and machine learning emulators

Testing the Limits of Atmospheric Correction over Turbid Norwegian Fjords