Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to ask the question – does mass customization really hold the key to customer value? It is argued that while mass customization can, and often does, increase the value of an offering, it is not always the case. In other words, mass customization does not represent the best strategy for all firms in all cases. Neoclassical economists tend to examine the concept of value in terms of utility. Utility is a measure of satisfaction a consumer receives from consumption of goods or services. Utility theory states that consumers spend their income to maximize their satisfaction or utility (Bowman and Ambrosini 2000). In this light, the concept of value delves deeper into the reasons behind consumer choice; in other words, how do consumers decide which offering will bestow maximum utility? For example, Zeithaml incorporates the notion of utility in her definition but goes further to encompass the basis on which utility is assessed, i.e. through what is given and what is received. Neoclassical economists tend to examine the concept of value in terms of utility. Utility is a measure of satisfaction a consumer receives from consumption of goods or services. Utility theory states that consumers spend their income to maximize their satisfaction or utility (Bowman and Ambrosini 2000). In this light, the concept of value delves deeper into the reasons behind consumer choice; in other words, how do consumers decide which offering will bestow maximum utility? For example, Zeithaml incorporates the notion of utility in her definition but goes further to encompass the basis on which utility is assessed, i.e. through what is given and what is received. It is critical that manufacturing firms understand whether their customers (existing and potential) really do value customization. The paper introduces the responsive agility tool that may provide the basis for an informed decision. The tool differentiates a number of value criteria and a method of selecting between them. Further, the tool identifies four levels of customization distinguished by secondary value criteria. We provide a case study demonstrating how the tool may operate in practice. The case study suggests that the tool may effectively differentiate customer types according to their value criteria. Finally the paper proposes that a value judgement is dependent on the negotiated process between a manufacturer and customer.

Customer customization: literature review and future prospects

A Research Review on the Key Technologies of Intelligent Design for Customized Products

Study on Mass Customization and Its Actualization

Dimensions of Customer Value for the Development of Digital Customization in the Clothing Industry

Study on System Optimization Method for the Actualization of Mass Customization

Impact of product customization level on consumer's word-of-mouth behaviors and contents: a field study

A New Customization Model for Enterprises Based on Improved Framework of Customer to Business: A Case Study in Automobile Industry

Customer management in Internet-based platform firms: review and future research directions

A Review of Research on Low-Carbon Customization

An integrated framework for customer value and customer-relationship-management performance: a customer-based perspective from China

A study on the measurement and application of customer loyalty

Research on Mass Customization under E-commerce Environment

Affective and Cognitive Design for Mass Personalization: Status and Prospect

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM) IN THE 21ST CENTURY: A REVIEW

Research on Consumers’ Perceived Value of Online Garment Customisation

Value Co-Creation: A Literature Review

The mass customization decade: An updated review of the literature

Mass customization: the key to customer value?

State-of-the-art Review of Customer to Business (C2B) Model

The past, present, and future of customer management

Customer experience: a systematic literature review and consumer culture theory-based conceptualisation