That old dog can still hunt—Alternative cutoffs and the recognition trial improve the classification accuracy of the Rey 15-Item Test.

Kelly Y. An,Kaitlyn Abeare,Laura Cutler,Maame Brantuo,Sami Ali,Luciano Giromini,Maurissa Hastings,Laszlo A. Erdodi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000557
2024-10-18
Professional Psychology Research and Practice
Abstract:This study was designed to test the upper limits of the Rey-15's classification accuracy in cognitively intact university students and clinical patients. A brief battery of neuropsychological tests was administered to all participants. Students were randomly assigned to either the control ( n = 80) or experimental malingering ( n = 59) condition. Invalid performance in patients ( n = 52) was psychometrically defined. The classification accuracy of the Rey-15 (original free recall and the combination score including the recognition trial developed by Boone et al., 2002) was computed across a range of cutoffs. A free recall ≤ 13 and combination score ≤ 25 produced a good combination of sensitivity (.41–.70) and specificity (.90–.94) among students. The highest cutoff to reach .90 specificity in clinical patients was free recall ≤ 11 and combination score ≤ 23, at .38–.56 sensitivity. Results confirmed the previous reports that more liberal alternative cutoffs maintain adequate specificity. Cutoffs can be raised even further in cognitively intact examinees. The introduction of the recognition trial provided a significant boost to the instrument's classification accuracy. The Rey-15 remains a cost-effective and clinically useful test in both clinical and research settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?