P025 Community lesion imaging clinics for tele-triage of suspected skin cancer: implementation of a low-cost model in an NHS trust

Hannah Morgan,Huw Greenish,Hafsa Faarax Shirwac,Colin Fleming,Alexander D G Anderson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.052
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Across the NHS there has been a significant and sustained rise in referrals for suspected skin cancer, resulting in a capacity crisis in many NHS trusts. Teledermatology has been successfully used to triage suspected skin cancer referrals nationally, but often involves dedicated medical photographers and expensive equipment. The aim of this study was to report the initial results of tele-triage based on a low-cost community imaging lesion clinic (CLIC) service using dermatology staff and readily available equipment. CLICs were provided in a community hospital setting and staffed by band 3 healthcare assistants. A structured questionnaire was completed and data entered directly into a cloud-based software platform (Islacare, London, UK) using an iPad. The same iPad was used to capture a localizing shot, a close-up macro shot using a readily available clip-on macro lens and a dermoscopic image using a Dermlite DL4. Patients under 18 years of age, those referred with more than three lesions, and patients with genital lesions were excluded. Referral letters, questionnaire data and images were reviewed by a senior dermatologist within 48 h on the Isla platform. In total, 438 patients were reviewed (489 lesions) between August and November 2023. The male-to-female ratio was 1.08, with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range 62–80). Overall, 122 of 438 patients (27.9%) were discharged directly from triage, with advice returned to the referrer. An additional 91 of 438 (20.8%) were identified as suitable for direct listing for biopsy or simple excision. Four of 438 (0.9%) were referred to another specialty following triage, one of 438 (0.2%) had a delayed face-to-face assessment organized, one of 438 (0.2%) declined to participate in tele-triage and requested a face-to-face appointment, one of 438 (0.2%) experienced technical problems, and in one of 438 (0.2%) the site for review was not clear. A potential total of 218 of 438 (49.8%) face-to-face assessments were avoided. The average time for clinician review was 2 min 55 s per patient. Tele-triage using a low-cost CLIC was well tolerated, feasible and effective and resulted in a capacity increase of almost 50%. A significant proportion of patients were managed in a community setting without the need for travel to hospital. One further advantage was the creation of a consecutive series of images and metadata suitable for future study of diagnostic artificial intelligence algorithms or submission to a national dataset.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?