Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect of exposed bone cement in treatment of infectious bone and soft tissue defect by comparison with routine bone cement therapy.Methods:A retrospective analysis was carried out in 27 patients who had been treated from January 2016 to January 2020. Of the 27 patients, 12 were treated by exposed bone cement filling for bone defect at the first stage, followed by flap and bone grafting at the second stage. Other 15 patients were treated by routine bone cement filling and flap repair at the first stage, followed by bone grafting at the second stage. Regular dressing change was carried out after surgery. All patients entered follow-up by out-patient review for wound condition and X-ray. Infection rate of bone and soft tissue, time of bone union, flap survive rate and complication were compared between the 2 groups.Results:The follow-up lased for 9-24(16.5±3.9 ) months. The bone defects were all healed. The treatment time of bone defects in the group of exposed bone cement was 25-34(28.5±2.8) weeks. The treatment time of bone defect in the routine cement group was 25-36(29.6±3.4 )weeks. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups( P<0.05). Two cases in each group had failed in infection control after bone cement implantation. With further debridement, cleaning and other treatment, the infection was under control. All flaps in the 2 groups survived. In the group of exposed bone cement, there were 3 flaps splitting, 2 hemorrhage(effusion) and 1 partial flap necrosis, In the routine bone cement group, there were 4 wound dehiscence, 8 hemorrhage(effusion) and 3 partial flaps necrosis. There was no significant difference in flap complications between the 2 groups( P>0.05). The healing of bone defect was evaluated by Samantha X-ray score, the scores of the 2 groups were 5.41±0.67 and 5.40±0.63, respectively, with no statistical significance. The Paley's approach was used to grade the bone healing and the function of adjacent joints. Paley bone defect healing evaluation results weve all excellent. Joint function assessment were as follow: in the group of exposed bone cement, 6 cases were excellent and 3 were good; in routine bone cement group: 6 cases were in excellent and 5 in good. There was no significant statistical difference. Conclusion:Compared with a routine bone cement treatment, the exposed bone cement in the treatment of infectious bone defects saw a fewer flap splitting and fewer hemorrhage/effusion, without an increase in bone and soft tissue infection. This procedure could be considered for further trials in the treatment of a composite defects of infected bone and soft tissue.

Evaluating the efficacy of combined flap coverage, antibiotic‐loaded bone cement and negative pressure irrigation in traumatic osteomyelitis management

The clinical efficacy of the vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the management of adult osteomyelitis

Modified Algorithm for Managing Postoperative Osteomyelitis Following Fracture Fixation with Cierny-Mader Type

A Modified Management of Implant Associated Postoperative Osteomyelitis With Cierny-Mader Type

Treatment of acute and chronic osteomyelitis with negative pressure wound therapy

Vacuum Sealing Drainage Treatment Combined with Antibiotic-Impregnated Bone Cement for Treatment of Soft Tissue Defects and Infection

Outcomes of Vacuum Sealing Drainage Treatment Combined with Skin Flap Transplantation and Antibiotic Bone Cement on Chronic Tibia Osteomyelitis: A Case Series Study

[Clinical study on negative pressure closed drainage combined with vancomycin loaded calcium sulfate and autogenous bone in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis]

Application and Clinical Effectiveness of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement to Promote Soft Tissue Granulation in the Treatment of Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers Complicated by Osteomyelitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Treatment of tibial traumatic osteomyelitis with negative pressure closure drainage combined with open bone grafting or bone migration and its effect on the levels of CRP, TNF-α and IL-6 in the serum

Comparison of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement coverage versus vacuum sealing drainage in semi-open bone grafting using for tibial fracture with infected bone and soft tissue defect: a retrospective analysis

Efficacy comparison of antibiotic bone cement-coated implants and external fixations for treating infected bone defects

Therapeutic effect of exposed bone cement in treatment of infectious bone and soft tissue defect

[Effectiveness of vacuum sealing drainage combined with modified external fixation antibiotic-impregnated cement semi-open technique in treating chronic ulcer wounds]

Clinical Study on Orthopaedic Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis with Soft Tissue Defect in Adults.

Comparison of the use of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate and wound irrigation-suction in the treatment of lower limb chronic osteomyelitis

The Effect of Calcium Sulfate/calcium Phosphate Composite for the Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis Compared with Calcium Sulfate

Combination therapy of negative pressure wound therapy and antibiotic‐loaded bone cement for accelerating diabetic foot ulcer healing: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Repairing effect of recombinant acidic fibroblast growth factor combined with vacuum drainage in fracture complicated with infection defects of chronic osteomyelitis

Combined Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Open Bone Graft for Infected Wounds with Bone Defects: an Experimental Study.

Antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer as definitive management for osteomyelitis