Abstract:The traditional purpose of a corporation is to pursue maximized profit,and a corporation is only responsible to its shareholders.As corporate operations begin to have widespread influences on the society,corporate social responsibility (CSR) is being increasingly stressed.It is believed that corporations should have two identities as a legal person.They are not only entities in private law,but also true members of the society.Since corporations benefit from the society, they should also contribute to the society,i.e.,to bear their social responsibility.As the social aspect of the law looms large,private law (including commercial law) gradually shifts from individualism to socialism and requires people to pay attention to social environment and care for social interests.Therefore,the socialization of private law constitutes the solid legal foundation of CSR. CSR is one type of obligations a corporation owes to the society.It refers largely to social obligations required by law,moral obligations as well as obligations occurring during operations that are neither explicitly required by law nor of a moral nature.This last type of obligations is a problem that the board of directors needs to solve when it makes and implements business strategies. It is also a problem that requires solutions in both theory and practice. The beneficiaries of CSR are largely the same as the non—shareholder stakeholders of corporations. As the stakeholder theory poses the issue of CSR as one aspect of corporate governance, it makes it possible to realize CSR.Boards of directors should make necessary arrangements on the social consequences of corporate activities when they make and implement their business strategies. They must have an accurate understanding of the extent of their obligations in this respect and perform such obligations seriously.Directors' duty of care shall include not only to meet the corporations' revenue targets,but also to adjust the relationship amongst the corporation,its shareholders and other stakeholders and maintain equilibrium amongst various interests.Directors should primarily work for the long—term interests of all shareholders.Furthermore,they should also ascertain and respect other stakeholders and establish a harmonious and mutually beneficial cooperative relationship.

Rules of Corporate Profit Distribution

Principle of Capital Maintenance And Protection of Company Asset

The Dilemma and Outlet of the Rule of Profit and Loss

Enterpriser and Share Tax-game Theory of the Corporation Income Tax

Social Responsiblity and Donation of Corporations

Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Influence on Corporate Law Theory

From the Corporation Law in Statutes to the Corporation Law in Practice

Correlation between distribution of cash dividends from capital reserves, ultimate controlling shareholders and corporate governance

Residual profit splitting: a theory-based approach to tax multinationals

Profit Distribution Policy in Family Enterprises

Study on the Application of the Rules of Corporate Personality Denial

Corporate Possession and Income Gap:A Problem Need to Be Illustrated

The Bearing of the Cost for Corporate Social Responsibility in the Legal Perspective

Nature and Limit of Organizational Rule

The Study of Presuit Demand Rule in Shareholders Derivative Suit

To Share or to Monopolize Profits?

On Good Faith Duty of the Controlling Shareholder of Listed Company

Adjustment on the Distribution Structure in Finance and Tax Law

The Difference in Distribution and Its Regulating by the Fiscal and Tax Law

Role of Corporate Finance Law in Corporations

Piercing the Corporation Veil:from Legal Rules to Practices