Abstract:Summary Background Results from the phase 3 CLEAR study showed that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to assess the health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes from the CLEAR study. Methods This open-label, randomised, phase 3 study was done across 200 hospitals and cancer centres in 20 countries. Patients were required to be 18 years or older, with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, and a Karnofsky performance status of 70% or higher. Patients who had received previous systemic anticancer therapy for renal cell carcinoma were not eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to lenvatinib (oral 20 mg per day) plus pembrolizumab (intravenous 200 mg every 21 days), lenvatinib (oral 18 mg per day) plus everolimus (oral 5 mg per day) in 21-day cycles, or sunitinib (oral 50 mg per day, 4 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off). Patients were assigned to treatments with a computer-generated randomisation scheme and were stratified by geographical region and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center prognostic groups. The primary endpoint, previously reported, was progression-free survival, and HRQOL was a secondary endpoint. Most HRQOL analyses were done in patients who underwent randomisation, received at least one dose of study treatment, and had any HRQOL data. Completion and compliance analyses were done in the full analysis set. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS), European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and the EQ-5D-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) preference questionnaire were administered at baseline and on day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02811861, and is closed to new participants. Findings Between Oct 13, 2016, and July 24, 2019, 355 patients were randomly assigned to the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group, 357 to the lenvatinib plus everolimus group, and 357 to the sunitinib group. Median follow-up for HRQOL analyses was 12·9 months (IQR 5·6–22·3). Because of the promising efficacy and safety results of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the first-line setting, we focus the HRQOL results in this report on that combination versus sunitinib. Mean change from baseline in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group compared with the sunitinib group was –1·75 (SE 0·59) versus –2·19 (0·66) for FKSI-DRS, –5·93 (0·86) versus –6·73 (0·94) for EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL), and –4·96 (0·85) versus –6·64 (0·94) for the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS). Median time to first deterioration in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group compared with the sunitinib group was 9·14 weeks (95% CI 6·43–12·14) versus 12·14 weeks (9·14–15·29; HR 1·13 [95% CI 0·94–1·35], log-rank p=0·20) for FKSI-DRS, 12·00 weeks (7·29–15·14) versus 9·14 weeks (6·29–12·14; 0·88 [0·74–1·05], log-rank p=0·17) for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL, and 9·43 weeks (6·43–12·29) versus 9·14 weeks (6·29–12·00; 0·83 [0·70–0·99], log-rank p=0·041) for the EQ-5D VAS. Median time to definitive deterioration in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group compared with the sunitinib group was 134·14 weeks (95% CI 120·00–not estimable) versus 117·43 weeks (90·14–131·29; HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·53–0·92], log-rank p=0·0081) for FKSI-DRS, 114·29 weeks (102·14–153·29) versus 75·14 weeks (57·29–105·14; 0·60 [0·47–0·77], log-rank p<0·0001) for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL, and 124·86 weeks (94·71–134·57) versus 74·86 weeks (54·14–96·00; 0·67 [0·53–0·85], log-rank p=0·0012) for the EQ-5D VAS. No outcomes on any of the instruments significantly favoured sunitinib over lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab. Most HRQOL comparisons of lenvatinib plus everolimus versus sunitinib were similar or favoured sunitinib. Interpretation These HRQOL results demonstrate that patients given lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab treatment had similar or favourable scores compared with patients given sunitinib, particularly with respect to time to definitive deterioration. These results support the efficacy and safety profile of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Funding Eisai (Nutley, NJ, USA) and Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co (Kenilworth, NJ, USA).

Belzutifan versus everolimus in participants (pts) with previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the phase 3 LITESPARK-005 study.

Belzutifan Plus Lenvatinib (len) for Chinese Patients (pts) with Previously Treated Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccrcc): Preliminary Results of Cohort 1 of the Phase 1 LITESPARK-010 Study.

FDA Approval Summary: Belzutifan for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Randomized phase 2 dose comparison LITESPARK-013 study of belzutifan in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Belzutifan Efficacy and Tolerability in Patients with Sporadic Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Phase Ii Study Of Everolimus In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Previously Treated With Bevacizumab-, Fluoropyrimidine-, Oxaliplatin-, And Irinotecan-Based Regimens

Effect of erythropoietin-stimulating agent use on belzutifan antitumor activity in patients with VHL disease–associated renal cell carcinoma: Post hoc analysis of the LITESPARK-004 study.

39 Safety profile of belzutifan monotherapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma: A pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials

Health-related Quality-of-life Results from SANET-ep: A Phase III Study of Surufatinib Versus Placebo for Advanced Extrapancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Belzutifan for patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated CNS haemangioblastomas (LITESPARK-004): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study

Belzutifan plus cabozantinib for patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma previously treated with immunotherapy: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study

Everolimus for Women with Trastuzumab-Resistant, HER2-positive, Advanced Breast Cancer (BOLERO-3): a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial.

Belzutifan versus Everolimus for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

SYST-18 BELZUTIFAN TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH VON HIPPEL-LINDAU DISEASE–ASSOCIATED CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM HEMANGIOBLASTOMAS ENROLLED IN THE PHASE 2 LITESPARK-004 STUDY

Health-related Quality of Life (hrqol) and Symptoms in LIBRETTO-431 Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus versus sunitinib (CLEAR): a randomised, phase 3 study

Combination of Everolimus with Trastuzumab Plus Paclitaxel As First-Line Treatment for Patients with HER2-positive Advanced Breast Cancer (BOLERO-1): a Phase 3, Randomised, Double-Blind, Multicentre Trial

Adjuvant Everolimus in Patients with Completely Resected, Very High-risk Renal Cell Carcinoma of Clear Cell Histology: Results from the Phase 3 Placebo-controlled SWOG S0931 (EVEREST) Trial

Oral Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 2α Inhibitor Belzutifan in Ocular von Hippel-Lindau Disease: Subgroup Analysis of the Single-Arm Phase 2 LITESPARK-004 Study

Abstract P4-12-18: BOLERO-3: Quality-of-life Maintained in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Everolimus Plus Trastuzumab Plus Vinorelbine

Phase 3 CLEAR study in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: outcomes in subgroups for the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and sunitinib arms