Treatment of humeral shaft fracture (Type B,C) with pre-rotating moulding locking plate by anterior approach MIPPO technique
Peixun Zhang,Zhongguo Fu,Yilin Wang,Mingtai Ma,Feng Xue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2017.01.002
2017-01-01
Abstract:Background Humeral shaft fractures are common,accounting for 2% of the total cases.In recent years,the treatment of humeral shaft fracture has been developed from traditional conservative plaster fixation to plate-screw and intramedullary nail fixation.The application of plate screw for open reduction and internal fixation or closed reduction intramedullary nail fixation has become the golden standard for surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures.The treatment of humeral shaft fracture with open reduction and internal plate fixation requires the stripping of soft tissuesand muscles.This operation interferes with the blood supply of fracture ends and increases the risk of radial nerve injury.With the renewal of biological fixation theory of AO,indirect reduction technique which emphasizes the protection of soft tissue around fracture has been thrived.It has been reported repeatedly in nation that humeral shaft fracture can be treat with percutaneous plate fixation through minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis,a strategy that results in high curing speed and less complication.Because of the specific anatomical structure of the humeral shaft,it is difficult to put a plate in front of the anterior longitudinal ridge.While the plate placed on the anterolateral side usually interferes with the radial nerve,the plate placed on the anteromedial side of the shaft also interferes with the neurovascular bundle.When the humeral fracture line is high,the corresponding proximal plate placement will affect the function of the shoulder joint.To treat the humeral shaft fracture with open reduction and plate fixation,the ideal position of the plate placement may be the lateral side of the humeral shaft when the plate is proximal to humeral fracture and the front side of the humeral shaft whenthe plate isdistal to humeral fracture.Therefore,the pre-rotating moulding locking plate become a possible solution for the treatment of humeral shaft fracture.From January 2012 to December 2015,16 cases of humeral shaft type B and type C fractures were treated with anterior approach pre-rotating moulding locking plate.The clinical curative effects and observations are summarized as follows.Methods (1)General data.16 patients (6 males and 10 females) aging from 43 to 70 years old (55.8±9.1) was documented.According to AO classification,11 cases are type B fracture,and 5 cases are type C fracture.Of the total 16 cases,5 cases were caused by traffic accidents,9 cases by tumble,and 2 cases by falling injury.All fractures were closed without radial nerve injury,while 2 patients with traffic accident suffered from combined head and lower limb soft tissue injury away from the fracture site.(2)Treatment measures.14 patients received brachial plexus anesthesia,and the other 2 patients received general anesthesia.4.5 mm locking compressed plate or lateral humeral anatomical plate (Biomed,USA)was used during the surgical operation,and 6° to 8° of plastic rotating moulding were made beforehand.The patient was supine,and the affected limb was placed on the X-ray abduction surgical plate.First of all,a longitudinal incision of approximately 4 cm in length were performed on the cubital upstream.After the radial nerve between the brachioradialis and brachialis was found,the front of the humeral distal part was exposed by splittingthe obrachialis under the radical nerve.Then,the proximal humerus was exposed with another 4 cm proximal longitudinal incision between the deltoid and pectoralis.A lateral muscle tunnel beyond the periosteum was drawn between distal and proximal incisions.With elbow flexion and traction reduction,a 10-12 holes pre-rotating moulding plate was inserted into the muscle channel with the proximal end placed on the lateral side of proximal humerus and the distal end placed on the front sideof distal humerus.After being placed properly under the intraoperative fluoroscopy,the plate was fixed with 3-4 locking screws on both the proximal and the distal side.Finally,the wound was closed after cleaning.(3)Postoperative treatment.All patients received forearm sling suspension protection for 3 weeks after the surgical operation.Starting from the second day of the surgery,passive shoulder joint and elbow joint functional exercise were performed within the range of pain tolerance of the patients.Active shoulder joint and elbow joint functional exercise were performed 3 weeks after the surgery.For the purpose of assessing the fracture curing time,the patients received X-ray check per month within 4 months of the operation,per 3 months after 4 months of the operation,and per 6 months after one year of the operation.The time of surgery,postsurgical complications,fracture curing time,and the range of motions ofshoulder joint and elbow jointwere also recorded.During the last time of postoperative follow-up,the visitors adopted the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) systems and Morrey elbow joint function evaluation systems to evaluate the functions of shoulder and elbow.Functions of shoulder joint were assessed by the UCLA grading standard,a criterion that includes the shoulder joint pain(10 points),range of motion(10 points),the initiative lift angle on anterior direction(5 points),muscle strength (5 points),and patients′ subjective satisfaction(5 points).The functions were evaluated from 4 aspects: the pain degree (45 points),range of motion (20 points),stability (10 points),and daily life ability (25 points).The total score is 100 points: 90-100 points is excellent;75-89 points is good;60-74 is ok;less than 60 points is poor.Results All patients had been followed up for 8 to 24 months (16.13±4.54).The surgical operation time rangesfrom 45 to 120 minutes (70.5±18.5),and the curing of the fracture take 10 to 21 weeks (13.5±3.0).The abduction of shoulder joint ranges from 105° to 120° (112.5°±4.6°);the forward flexion ranges from 150° to 170° (165.4°±6.0°).The extension of elbow joint ranges from 0° to 8° (4.8°±2.0°);the flexion ranges from 120° to 140° (132.5°±5.8°).Out of the 16 treated patients,there was only one case of clinical triggered damage of radical nerve.With the treatment of neurotrophic drugs and electrostimulation,the dorsiflexion of wrist and thumb fully recovered one month after the surgery.In the last postoperative assessment,the UCLA score were excellent for 15 patients and good for 1 patient.During the last postoperative follow-up,the visitors further adopted the Morrey evaluation system for the evaluation of the functions of elbow and joint.The score were excellent for 14 patients and good for 2 patients.Conclusions Nowadays,open reduction and internal fixation is considered asthe most reliable surgical method for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.Open reduction and plate fixation may result in large operative trauma and severe destruction of the blood supply toward soft tissues and periosteal.With the current development of the biological fixation,the concepts of minimally invasive treatment and the protection for blood supply toward fracture ends aregradually accepted.Moreover,the use of MIPPO technology for the treatment of limb fractures is becoming more and moreprevalent.Humeral shaft fractures treated with MIPPO technology can achieve better outcomes,and fractures after remodeling can achieve higher strength.The locking plate with pre-rotating moulding anatomically fits better to the anterolateral side of humerus.Locking plate with pre-rotating moulding combined with MIPPO technology reduce the irritation to muscle and soft tissue,effectively protect the blood supply toward the fracture site and the radial nerve,and improve the safety of the surgical operation.