Abstract:Introduction. Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) employed in relapsed/refractory (R/R) and, more recently, also in newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Ph-like ALL is a genetically heterogenous subgroup that shares a common transcriptional profile, similar to that of true Ph+ ALL, though lacking the BCR::ABL1 rearrangement. Ph-like ALL is characterized by a poor prognosis, a high relapse rate and a worse overall survival if treated with standard chemotherapy. Several molecular pathways are involved, including JAK/STAT, CRLF2 and ABL-class mutations, providing a heterogeneous genetic landscape with very limited data on the subsequent clinical outcome. Few isolated cases of successful treatment of R/R Ph-like ALL with ponatinib have been reported, including also patients with lesions different from ABL-class mutations. Currently, ponatinib prescription in Italy is not allowed for Ph-like ALL. Patients and Methods. Between January 2019 and July 2023, 17 patients were candidate to receive ponatinib on a nominate compassionate use basis; data were collected in the context of the Campus ALL network in Italy. The criteria for inclusion were a diagnosis of Ph-like ALL, with either hematological or molecular evidence of disease, and a treatment period of at least 28 consecutive days of ponatinib. The Ph-like signature was based on the BCR/ABL1 like-predictor (Chiaretti et al, BJH 2018) and, whenever possible, targeted RNA sequencing. Final data were collected for 15 patients (2 patients were excluded due to a treatment period <28 days) treated with ponatinib either as a single agent or in association with immuno and/or chemotherapy. Results. All patients had common ALL. Eight of the 15 cases were classified as high risk or very high risk ALL at diagnosis; 10 were males, the median age was 28 years (14-66) and the median white blood count at diagnosis was 25.6 x10 9/l (2.7-317 x10 9/l). Targeted RNA sequencing was carried out in 10/15 cases: 7 presented gene fusions ( ABL-class mutations in 2, JAK2 mutations in 2, and CRLF2::P2RY8, IKZF1::DDC and RB1::RCBTB2 in 1 case each); 2 additional cases had a CRLF2 rearrangement, evaluated by FISH. Copy number aberrations analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technology was performed in 12/15 cases: 5 cases had a IKZF1 plus signature, 6 had a IZKF1 loss, while 1 case was IKZF1 wild type. Ponatinib was started in first (n=2) or second (n=5) hematologic relapse in 7 patients (46%), with 3 also having an extramedullary disease; 7 additional patients (46%) were treated in first (n=5) or second (n=2) minimal residual disease (MRD) persistence/recurrence; finally, 1 patient was refractory to 3 subsequent lines of treatment. In 8/15 patients ponatinib was used as single agent or in association with steroids or intrathecal chemotherapy only, in 4 it was administered in combination with chemotherapy and in 3 with blinatumomab; 7 patients started ponatinib after having failed an allogeneic transplant (6 hematologic relapses and 1 molecular relapse). A complete hematological and molecular remission (MRD- CR) was achieved in 6 patients (40%); notably, 4 of these 6 cases carried a gene fusion (1 JAK2 rearrangement, 1 ABL-class fusion, 1 IKZF1::DDC and 1 RB1::RCBTB2); 2 further patients in hematologic relapse at the start of treatment achieved a MRD+ CR (1 patient had a ABL-class gene fusion). Thus, the overall response rate was 53%. Four patients were refractory, while 2 maintained a stable disease. After ponatinib-based treatment, 6 patients were allografted and 1 received a CAR-T cell infusion. The toxicity profile was mild: 3 patients developed a transaminitis, 1 also had a fungal pneumonia, and 1 an increase in pancreatic enzymes. At a median follow-up of 3 months (1-5), 10 patients are alive, 8 being in continuous complete remission. Conclusions. Treatment with ponatinib showed promising results in terms of CR achievement in a heavily pre-treated population of Ph-like ALL patients, with an acceptable toxicity profile. In a pre-transplant setting, ponatinib was effective as a bridge to cellular therapies in 7 out of 8 patients as intention-to-treat (ITT), thus suggesting that this strategy may represent an effective bridge to further therapies. To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of adult Ph-like ALL cases treated with ponatinib so far reported.

Safety and outcomes of maintenance therapy with third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with T315I mutation

Venetoclax-ponatinib for T315I/compound-mutated Ph Plus Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Chemotherapy with the Use of Next‐generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Based on Measurable Residual Disease Has the Potential to Avoid Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Treatment for Adults with Philadelphia Chromosome–positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

T315I mutation exerts a dismal prognosis on adult BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and salvage therapy with ponatinib or CAR-T cell and bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can improve clinical outcomes

Ponatinib therapy in recurrent Philadelphia chromosome‐positive central nervous system leukemia with T315I mutation after Allo‐HSCT

Toxicities associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor maintenance following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Maintenance Sorafenib Is Superior To Prophylactic Dli In Improving The Prognosis Of Flt3-Itd-Positive Aml After Allogeneic Hsct

Application of Imatinib Plus Hyper-CVAD Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Ph Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

Pre-Emptive Tyrosine Kinase-Inhibitor Intervention Based on BCR/ABL1 Monitoring in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after Allo-HSCT: Two Independent Observational Cohort Study

A prophylactic tyrosine kinase inhibitor strategy based on measurable residual disease pre‐transplantation for Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A prospective multicenter cohort study

Administration of Imatinib after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation May Improve Disease-Free Survival for Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphobla Stic Leukemia

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Ponatinib and Dasatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Central Nervous System Relapse: A Retrospective Study

Ponatinib‐review of historical development, current status, and future research

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Results of ponatinib as frontline therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase

Characteristics and Mutation Analysis of Ph-positive Leukemia Patients with T315I Mutation Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Long-Term Remission in T315I+ Relapsed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Blinatumomab and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Two Case Studies

A Multicenter Retrospective Chart Review Study of Treatment and Disease Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Third-Line Treatment or with T315I Mutation

Ponatinib as a Prophylactic or Pre-Emptive Strategy to Prevent Cytological Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Transplanted in Complete Cytological Remission

Use of Ponatinib Alone or Combined with Other Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Ph-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. a Campus ALL Real-Life Study

Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: To Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Or Not? A Single Center Experience