Relational Autonomy and Family Dispute Resolution: How a Feminist Approach Can Improve Service Delivery in the Context of Family Violence

S. Dobinson
2016-01-22
Abstract:In the Australian family law system, separating parents must attempt to mediate their parenting disputes before they are able to seek court orders. The legislation does offer possible exemptions, including for cases involving family violence. Yet research shows that such cases frequently undergo family dispute resolution (FDR). This can expose victims and their children to serious safety risks, both during FDR and in post-mediation agreements. However, findings suggest that when family violence is identified and handled appropriately, FDR can be a rewarding and empowering experience for victims. Therefore, it is important that we continue efforts to develop specialised models and improve service delivery across Australia. With this goal in mind, this paper will critique the use of FDR in the context of family violence using a feminist theory of relational autonomy. Given the central role of feminist theorists in the development of mediation theory and practice, ongoing feminist critique remains crucial to the development of best practice in the context of family violence. Feminist theories of relational autonomy also offer a useful tool for analysing a process dependent on one’s ability to advocate for one’s own interests in relation to those of an ex-partner. It is hoped that such analysis will, like the work of feminists in the last decade, contribute to the improvement of the use of FDR in the context of family violence.
Law,Sociology,Political Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?