Cleft Lip Repair Comparison Between Inpatient and Outpatient Surgeries: A Multi-Surgeon Experience

Haven M. Howell,Laura I. Galarza,Laura S. Humphries,Ian C. Hoppe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241278569
2024-08-30
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Abstract:The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, Ahead of Print. ObjectiveGreat variability exists as to whether cleft lip (CL) repair is performed as an inpatient or outpatient surgery. This study's aim is to investigate the authors' institutional experience to see if there is an increase in complications, emergency department (ED) visits, or readmissions to the hospital when performed as outpatient.DesignThis study reviewed patients who underwent CL repair between 2012 and 2023 at the authors' institution. Data collected included patient demographics, perioperative details, ED visits and readmissions within thirty days of surgery, and complications.ResultsOne hundred forty-five patients met inclusion measures. When the surgery was performed as outpatient, there was no significant difference in returning to the ED (p = 0.767) or readmission to the hospital (p = 0.447) within thirty days as compared to inpatient surgeries. Outpatients did not have more postoperative complications (p = 0.698). Bilateral cleft lips were more likely to be performed as inpatient (p = 0.001). Inpatients had a lower weight at time of repair (p = 0.033). Patients with a respiratory (p = .006), gastrointestinal (p = 0.003), or hematologic (p = 0.013) comorbidity had a higher readmission rate. Patients were more likely to be readmitted if they had a younger gestational age (p = 0.005).ConclusionThere was no increased return to the ED or readmission for patients undergoing inpatient versus outpatient CL repair. CL repair can be performed safely in an outpatient setting with careful patient selection.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?