Abstract:The 21st century is known as the "flat world" where people can communicate from anywhere, anytime. It is imperative that educators ensure their students have the necessary skills for adapting to the modern world, such as communication, creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration. By learning English, students will not only shorten their learning gaps for new opportunities but will also increase their chances of becoming global citizens. However, since most Vietnamese students do not know how to practice or promote their critical thinking skills while learning English, it is crucial that teachers understand and apply a variety of techniques and strategies to activate and guide students' critical thinking. Brookfield and Preskill (2005) state that well-structured- questions raise students' awareness of using their knowledge and comprehension of a subject at lower-order thinking skills (remember-understand-apply) to higher-order thinking skills (analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and creation). To learn how Vietnamese teachers delegate critical thinking questions to their students and how often they do so, the researchers conducted the study using a quantitative method to figure out how teachers' questioning techniques promote students' critical thinking skills. This study uses a quantitative methodology in which the researchers developed the questionnaires based on Bloom Taxonomy's thinking orders and contributed to Vietnamese Teachers for data collection. The results showed that most Vietnamese teachers know how to use questioning techniques and frequently develop them during their teaching. They use questions to evaluate learners' conceptual understandings and provide them with feedback on their thinking processes from simple to complex concepts and provide hints or alternative explanations, which boost the development of students' critical thinking skills.

Critical thinking, questioning and student engagement in Korean university English courses

Delegating Critical Thinking Skills in Learners through Effective Questioning Technique in the Class

Utilising K-culture for Korean college students writing identity essays: online class cases

The effects of Socratic questioning on critical thinking in web-based collaborative learning

The relationship between critical thinking skills and in‐class questioning behaviours of English language teaching students

Critical Thinking Activities to Improve Senior High School Students’ Speaking Skills

THE EFFECTS OF QUESTIONING AS PRE-READING ACTIVITY ON EFL GRADE 12 STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING IN READING CLASSES IN KIEN GIANG, VIETNAM

Rethinking linguistic capitals and asset-based language learning: an examination of bilingual Korean-Chinese instruction for international students in South Korea

Incorporating Korean Culture in English Language Teaching for Intercultural Communication: Adopting CCA Approach

Informal digital learning of English and strategic competence for cross-cultural communication: Perception of varieties of English as a mediator

The impact of socio-cultural factors on translator education in Korea

Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings

Critical Thinking and Chinese International Students: An East-West Dialogue

Fostering critical thinking in English-as-a-second-language classrooms: Challenges and opportunities

Using Socratic Questioning to Promote Students’ Critical Thinking Skills

English as an important but unfair resource: university students’ perception of English and English language education in South Korea

Insights into intercultural communication from a global citizenship framework: Voices of South Korean university students

TEACHER QUESTIONING ON STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY IN HIGH SCHOOL ENGLISH READING

Critical thinking skills in English academic writing: An exploratory interview study of the perceptions and the experiences of EFL tutors at a Hungarian university

Engaging with cross‐cultural communication barriers in globalized higher education: the case of research‐degree students

To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education