Abstract:We investigate the effectiveness of the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), a not‐for‐profit organization that facilitates environmental disclosures of firms with institutional investors, thereby serving as a corporate governance mechanism for shareholders to influence the firm's environmental disclosures. We examine firm characteristics associated with firms' decisions to disclose carbon‐related information via the CDP for a sample of 319 Canadian firms over a four‐year period. In particular, we examine how firms' decisions to disclose via CDP are associated with shareholder activism, litigation risk, and the opportunity for low‐cost positive publicity once requested by the firms' “signatory” investors. Our results also show that management's decision to release climate change data is associated with domestic, but not foreign, signatory investors. We also find that disclosing firms tend to be those from lower polluting industries with less exposure to litigation risk. This suggests that this new form of coordinated shareholder activism may not be successful at altering the behavior of firms that are heavier polluters. Les auteurs se penchent sur l'efficacité du Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), organisme sans but lucratif qui s'emploie à promouvoir la communication d'information environnementale par les entreprises ayant des investisseurs institutionnels, un mécanisme de gouvernance grâce auquel les actionnaires peuvent exercer une influence sur l'information environnementale publiée par les sociétés. Ils étudient les caractéristiques de l'entreprise associées à la décision de communiquer l'information relative aux émissions de carbone par l'intermédiaire du CDP, pour un échantillon de 319 sociétés canadiennes sur une période de quatre ans. Ils se demandent en particulier en quoi la décision des sociétés de communiquer des données par l'intermédiaire du CDP est liée à l'activisme des actionnaires, aux risques de litiges et à la perspective d'une publicité positive à faible coût une fois l'information demandée par les investisseurs « signataires » des sociétés. Les résultats de l'étude indiquent que la décision de la direction de publier des données sur les changements climatiques est associée aux investisseurs signataires nationaux, mais non aux investisseurs signataires étrangers. Les auteurs constatent également que les sociétés qui publient cette information sont généralement celles qui appartiennent à des secteurs d'activité moins polluants, moins exposés aux risques de litiges. Ces observations portent à croire que cette nouvelle forme d'activisme conjugué des actionnaires pourrait ne pas parvenir à modifier le comportement des sociétés qui sont d'importants pollueurs.

How does sustainability leadership improve climate change reporting? The choices associated with a sustainable board- A management perspective

Climate change disclosure and sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the 2030 agenda: the moderating role of corporate governance

Board Effectiveness and the Voluntary Disclosure of Climate Change Information

The impact of corporate governance on sustainability performance

Board attributes and sustainability reporting of selected listed nonfinancial firms in anglophone Sub-Saharan African countries: A multinomial logistic regression

Does the sustainability committee matter in the efficacy of sustainability reporting and firm performance?

The relevance of carbon performance and board characteristics on carbon disclosure

Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change

The Decision of corporate carbon emission governance: The Mediating role of financial leverage

Climate change and business accountability, empirical evidence on the roles of environmental strategy and environmental accounting

Factors Influencing Corporate Environmental Disclosures

Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions

What Drives the Sustainability Reporting Intentions of Firms?

The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Climate Governance Disclosure

Determinants of environmental disclosure: investigating new and conventional corporate governance characteristics

ESG performance and disclosure quality: does a well-balanced board of directors matter when impression management occurs?

Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation

Sustainability performance, executive compensation, market value, and say-on-pay voting adoption: evidence from the STOXX Europe 600

The mediating role of carbon emissions in the relationship between the board attributes and ESG performance: European evidence

Coming Clean: The Impact of Environmental Performance and Visibility on Corporate Climate Change Disclosure