Abstract:Background: Effective co-practice is essential to deliver services for children with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN). The necessary skills, knowledge and resources are distributed amongst professionals and agencies. Co-practice is complex and a number of barriers, such as 'border disputes' and poor awareness of respective priorities, have been identified. However social-relational aspects of co-practice have not been explored in sufficient depth to make recommendations for improvements in policy and practice. Here we apply social capital theory to data from practitioners: an analytical framework with the potential to move beyond descriptions of socio-cultural phenomena to inform change. Aims: Co-practice in a local authority site was examined to understand: (1) the range of social capital relations extant in the site's co-practice; (2) how these relations affected the abilities of the network to collaborate; (3) whether previously identified barriers to co-practice remain; (4) the nature of any new complexities that may have emerged; and (5) how inter-professional social capital might be fostered. Methods & procedures: A qualitative case study of SLCN provision within one local authority in England and its linked NHS partner was completed through face-to-face semi-structured interviews with professionals working with children with SLCN across the authority. Interviews, exploring barriers and facilitators to interagency working and social capital themes, were transcribed, subjected to thematic analysis using iterative methods and a thematic framework derived. Outcomes & results: We identified a number of characteristics important for the effective development of trust, reciprocity and negotiated co-practice at different levels of social capital networks: macro-service governance and policy; meso-school sites; and micro-intra-practitioner knowledge and skills. Barriers to co-practice differed from those found in earlier studies. Some negative aspects of complexity were evident, but only where networked professionalism and trust was absent between professions. Where practitioners embraced and services and systems enabled more fluid forms of collaboration, then trust and reciprocity developed. Conclusions & implications: Highly collaborative forms of co-practice, inherently more complex at the service governance, macro-level, bring benefits. At the meso-level of the school and support team network there was greater capacity to individualize co-practice to the needs of the child. Capacity was increased at the micro-level of knowledge and skills to harness the overall resource distributed amongst members of the inter-professional team. The development of social capital, networks of trust across SLCN support teams, should be a priority at all levels-for practitioners, services, commissioners and schools.

Capital sharing and socialization in an interprofessional student-led clinic: a Bourdieuan analysis

Building workplace social capital: A longitudinal study of student nurses' clinical placement experiences

'Team capital' in quality improvement teams: findings from an ethnographic study of front-line quality improvement in the NHS

A qualitative case study in the social capital of co-professional collaborative co-practice for children with speech, language and communication needs

Towards the idea of 'clinical capital': A longitudinal study exploring nurses' dispositions and workplace manifestations in an Australian intensive care unit

Bourdieu at the bedside: briefing parents in a pediatric hospital

Cultural considerations in interprofessional education and practice

A Bourdieusian approach to class‐related inequalities: the role of capitals and capital structure in the utilisation of healthcare services in later life

In Search of the Social in Psychological Capital: Integrating Psychological Capital into a Broader Capital Framework

Perspectives of structurally marginalised patients attending contextually tailored and integrated care practices in Canada: a focused ethnography study

Clinician experience of being interprofessional: an interpretive phenomenological analysis

From corners to community: exploring medical students' sense of belonging through co-creation in clinical learning

An evaluation of an interprofessional practice-based learning environment using student reflections

How Clinician-Scientists Access and Mobilise Social Capital and Thus Contribute to the Professional Development of Their Colleagues in Their Networks

How do interprofessional student teams interact in a primary care clinic? A qualitative analysis using activity theory

Intra- and interprofessional practices through fresh eyes: a qualitative analysis of medical students' early workplace experiences

When health is wealth: occupationally differentiated patterns of health capital in post-industrial Europe

Family, friend or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development

Performativity, identity formation and professionalism: Ethnographic research to explore student experiences of clinical simulation training

Development of Interprofessional Competencies Through the Process of Collaborative Clinical Reasoning: A Qualitative Study

Bridging the Gap or Widening the Divide? Exploring the Dual Role of Social Capital in Healthcare Financing in Rural Uttar Pradesh, India