The Excess of Carriers in Rare Disorders Suggests a Nonpathogenic Effect for Most Variants of Uncertain Significance

Stefano Medaglia,Jaume Reig‐Palou,Ariadna Bellés,Nerea Moreno‐Ruiz,Jairo Rodríguez,Xavier Armengol,Juan Ignacio Aróstegui,Lluís Armengol,Juan José Guillén,Hafid Laayouni,Ferran Casals
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.14642
2024-11-07
Clinical Genetics
Abstract:We compared the reported prevalence of rare recessive diseases obtained from epidemiological data with the population mutational load in their causative genes. If the knowledge of the genetic etiology of the disease is correct, the two estimates should be similar (A). Differences between the two estimates may be due to incomplete knowledge of the variants or genes involved in the disease (B) or to errors in the effect prediction of the genetic variants (C). The latter situation is often caused by an excess of variants of uncertain significance (VOUS), an abundant mutation type with questioned medical management, and which our analysis suggests would mostly have a benign effect. Functional annotation and interpretation of genetic variants are a critical step in genetic diagnosis, as it may lead to personalized therapeutic options and genetic counseling. While the number of confirmed pathogenic genetic variants in an individual is relatively low, the number of variants of uncertain significance (VOUS) can be considerably higher, increasing the number of potential carriers of genetic disorders. Thus, reducing uncertainty and assessing the real effect of VOUS are crucial for clinical and medical genetics. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of genetic screening technologies in accurately predicting pathogenic variants and their corresponding disease prevalence in a cohort of over 6000 healthy individuals involved in assisted reproduction programs. Using data from 305 genes associated with recessive disorders, we determined the frequency of carriers of pathogenic variants and VOUS in our dataset and compared the predicted prevalence based on this information with reported population prevalence data. The higher predicted prevalence in some disorders when considering VOUS suggests a mostly benign effect.
genetics & heredity
What problem does this paper attempt to address?