Abstract:Abstract Background The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) is increasingly used to screen for self-perceived oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in community-dwelling elders. A summated EAT-10 total score ranges from 0 to 40, with a score ≥ 3 indicative of OD. When using cut-points of a summated score, important requirements for the measurements are specific objectivity, validity, and reliability. Analysis by the Rasch model allows investigation of whether scales like EAT-10 satisfy these requirements. Currently, a few studies have found that EAT-10 responses from clinical populations with OD do not adequately fit the Rasch model. Purpose The aim of this study was to determine whether measurements by EAT-10 fit the Rasch model when applied in screening self-perceived OD in non-clinical populations. Methods Secondary analysis was conducted on data from a cross-sectional survey of community-dwelling elders living in a municipal district of Tokyo, Japan, in which 1875 respondents completed the Japanese version of EAT-10 (J-EAT-10). Data were cleaned and recoded for the purpose of the analysis in this study, which resulted in inclusion of J-EAT-10 responses from 1144 respondents. Data were analyzed using RUMM2030 and included overall model fit, reliability, unidimensionality, threshold ordering, individual item and person fits, differential item functioning, local item dependency, and targeting. Results The analysis identified that the response categories from zero to four were not used as intended and did not display monotonicity, which necessitated reducing the five categories to three. Considerable floor effect was demonstrated and there was an inappropriate match between items’ and respondents’ estimates. The person separation reliability (PSI = 0.65) was inadequate, indicating that it is not possible to differentiate between different levels of OD. Several items displayed misfit with the Rasch model, and there were local item dependency and several redundant items. Conclusions J-EAT-10 performed less than optimally and exhibited substantial floor effect, low reliability, a rating scale not working as intended, and several redundant items. Different improvement strategies failed to resolve the identified problems. Use of J-EAT-10 in population-based surveys cannot therefore be recommended. For such purpose, alternative screening tools of self-perceived OD should be chosen or a new one should be developed and validated.

Convergent and discriminant validity of the Minimal Eating Observation Form – version II: a cross-sectional study

The Minimal Eating Observation Form-Ii (Meof-Ii): Cross-Cultural Validation of the Chinese Version for People with Stroke

Cross-sectional study on dysphagia evaluation in community-dwelling older adults using the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT)-10, EAT-2, and Water Swallow Test

Validation of the Observing Scale in Chinese Populations

The validation of short eating disorder, body dysmorphia, and Weight Bias Internalisation Scales among UK adults

Development and validation of the mindful eating scale (mind-eat scale) in a general population

The Validity of the Eating Disorder Examination and its Subscales

Development and Psychometric Validation of the EDE-QS, a 12 Item Short Form of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)

Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination-questionnaire: A systematic review of the literature

Assessing Discriminant Validity through Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Eating Compulsivity

Evaluating Emotional Eating in Children from the Perspective of Parents: Psychometric Properties of the Parent Version of the Emotional Eating Scale Adapted for Children and Adolescents

Construct validity and reliability of a French–Canadian translation of the eating in the absence of hunger questionnaire for children and adolescents

Brief Emotional Eating Scale: A Multinational Study of Factor Structure, Validity, and Invariance.

Orthorexia nervosa: examining the Eating Habits Questionnaire's reliability and validity, and its links to dietary adequacy among adult women

The Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Screening Test for Patients and Professionals: Validation in Cognitive Impairment and in Severe Mental Illness

Item analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders

Intuitive Eating Scale-2-EA: Psychometric properties and factor structure of the adapted IES-2 for early adolescents

Validation of a brief version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16) with an older Norwegian population

Development and preliminary validation of a novel eating disorder screening tool for vegetarians and vegans: the V-EDS

Emotional overeating questionnaire: a validation study in Italian adults with obesity, overweight or normal weight

Validation of the Interpersonal Relationships in Eating Disorders (IR‐ED) Scale in an Eating Disorder Sample