Influence of nanoparticles in UHPC by intensive (vacuum) mixing studies

E. Arvaniti,G. Schutter,T. Bultreys,V. Boel,J. Dils,N. Belie,T. Kock
Abstract:optimal packing density, a suitable mixing procedure and an effective match between a third generation superplasticizer and the binders. By increasing the level of performance, it is questionable how the robustness of the mixture evolves. What is the effect of a different silica fume and superplasticizer on the workability and the compressive strength? Also an undesirable increase in air content can alter the fresh and hardened properties. In order the control the air content a vacuum mixer can help. In case of the silica fume and superplasticizer, compatibility tests should be performed in advance. This paper reports the influence of the smallest particles in ultra-high performance concrete, how they affect the fresh and hardened properties. The air content was decreased by lowering the pressure in the mixing pan from 1013 mbar to 50 mbar. CT-scans clearly show a reduction of the air cavities. Furthermore, six different types of silica fume from two companies were tested. The workability was checked with the mini-slump flow. Besides this, three cubes were tested to determine the compressive strength. The effect of the superplasticizer was investigated by evaluating the slump life of 5 different types of polycarboxylate ethers. In conclusion, an ultra-high performance concrete was achieved with a compressive strength of 173 MPa. This was due to the selection of a good superplasticizer and silica fume. The air content reduction also contributed to an increased strength. Further research should be focussed on the durability and service life of such a dense concrete type.
Materials Science,Engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?