Abstract:This study proposes a new methodology for calibrating headwater groundwater flow models by combining streamflow time series and maps of perennial and intermittent stream networks. The methodology is tested in two catchments where we evaluate strong contrasts in hydraulic conductivity and porosity to explain differences in stream intermittency dynamics. Our results provide a valuable framework for modelling poorly gauged basins and better understanding the groundwater controls on stream intermittency, with potential extensions using remote sensing and crowdsourced data. Non‐perennial streams play a crucial role in ecological communities and the hydrological cycle. However, the key parameters and processes involved in stream intermittency remain poorly understood. While climatic conditions, geology and land use are well identified, the assessment and modelling of groundwater controls on streamflow intermittence remain a challenge. In this study, we explore new opportunities to calibrate process‐based 3D groundwater flow models designed to simulate hydrographic network dynamics in groundwater‐fed headwaters. Streamflow measurements and stream network maps are considered together to constrain the effective hydraulic properties of the aquifer in hydrogeological models. The simulations were then validated using visual observations of water presence/absence, provided by a national monitoring network in France (ONDE). We tested the methodology on two pilot unconfined shallow crystalline aquifer catchments, the Canut and Nançon catchments (Brittany, France). We found that both streamflow and stream network expansion/contraction dynamics are required to calibrate models that simultaneously estimate hydraulic conductivity K and porosity Φ with low uncertainties. The calibration allowed good prediction of stream intermittency, both in terms of flow and spatial extent. For the two catchments studied, Canut and Nançon, the hydraulic conductivity is close reaching 1.5 × 10−5 m/s and 4.5 × 10−5 m/s, respectively. However, they differ more in their storage capacity, with porosity estimated at 0.1% and 2.2%, respectively. Lower storage capacity leads to higher groundwater level fluctuations, shorter aquifer response times, an increase in the proportion of intermittent streams and a reduction in perennial flow. This new modelling framework for predicting headwater streamflow intermittence can be deployed to improve our understanding of groundwater controls in different geomorphological, geological and climatic contexts. It will benefit from advances in remote sensing and crowdsourcing approaches that generate new observational data products with high spatial and temporal resolution.

Large-scale spatial reconstitution of groundwater fluxes in a karst aquifer on the basis of hydrodynamic and hydrodispersive measurements

Multi-scale hydrostructural approach for karst environment. Application to the Arcier hydrosystem (Eastern France)

Multi-scale characterization of a complex karst and alluvial aquifer system in southern Germany using a combination of different tracer methods

Tracer Dispersion through Karst Conduit: Assessment of Small-Scale Heterogeneity by Multi-Point Tracer Test and CFD Modeling

Assessment of groundwater recharge processes through karst vadose zone by cave percolation monitoring

Improving calibration of groundwater flow models using headwater streamflow intermittence

An inverse approach integrating flowmeter and pumping test data for three-dimensional aquifer characterization

Detecting infiltrated water and preferential flow pathways through time-lapse ground-penetrating radar surveys

On the value of hydrochemical data for the interpretation of flow and transport processes in the Baget karst system, France

Impact of groundwater flow across tectonic aquifer compartments in a Miocene sandstone aquifer: three-dimensional hydrogeological modeling of the Kasserine aquifer system in central Tunisia and northeastern Algeria

The worth of stochastic inversion for identifying connectivity by means of a long‐lasting large‐scale hydraulic test: The Salar de Atacama case study

Hydrogeologic investigation of groundwater velocity for matrix and conduit in a karst aquifer

Influence of sediments burying the discharge area of a karst aquifer on the groundwater flow field—Numerical testing of conceptual models

Integrating field work and large-scale modeling to improve assessment of karst water resources

Pore water isotope fingerprints to understand the spatiotemporal groundwater recharge variability in ungauged watersheds

Hydrogeophysical characterization of transport processes in fractured rock by combining push-pull tracer tests and single-hole ground penetrating radar

Structure-coupled joint inversion of geophysical and hydrological data

Combining implicit geological modeling, field surveys, and hydrogeological modeling to describe groundwater flow in a karst aquifer

Stochastic Inversion of a Tomographic Pumping Test: Identifying Conductivity Horizontal Correlation and Longitudinal Macrodispersivity

Tracer tests to infer the drainage of the multiple porosity aquifer of Luxembourg Sandstone (Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg): implications for drinking water protection

A data-driven approach for modelling Karst spring discharge using transfer function noise models