Abstract:Introduction: Disparities exist in cardiovascular health (CVH) by sexual identity and race/ethnicity separately, however an understanding of the intersectional effect of these identities has been limited. Objective: To evaluate differences in ideal CVH, as captured in the American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8 framework, across race/ethnicity and sexual identity. Methods: This study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2007-2016). Non-institutionalized adults (18-59 years) without a history of cardiovascular disease/stroke and who were not pregnant at the time of the interview were included. Self-reported race/ethnicity was categorized as non-Hispanic Black (hereafter Black), Hispanic, non-Hispanic White (hereafter White), and another race. Self-reported sexual identity was categorized as straight and sexual minority (SM), which encompassed those who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or something else. The primary outcome was total CVH score (range 0 -100), which is the unweighted average of 8 CVH components, assessed using questionnaire, dietary, and physical examination data. Sex-stratified regression models were developed for the overall CVH score and CVH components, adjusting for age and study year. Results: The sample included 12,256 adults (mean age 39.6 years [SD 11.7]). While Black (ß= -4.9, 95% CI -7.7, -2.0), Hispanic (ß= -4.9, 95% CI -9.6, -0.2), and White (ß = -5.9, 95% CI -8.8, -3.0) SM female adults had lower total CVH scores compared to their straight counterparts, female participants of another race and SM male adults of any race/ethnicity did not. Black SM female individuals had less favorable nicotine (ß= -20.9, 95% CI -32.3, -9.4) and blood pressure (ß= -7.2, 95% CI -13.8, -0.6) scores compared with Black straight females. Hispanic SM female individuals had less favorable body mass index scores (ß= -15.6, 95% CI -28.0, -3.2) compared with Hispanic straight females. Conclusions: CVH differed across racial/ethnic identities in SM females but not SM males. Longitudinal studies are needed to identify mechanisms driving CVH disparities in Black and Hispanic SM females.

LGBTQ+ cardiovascular health equity: a brief review

Tackling cardiovascular healthcare disparities for LGBTQIA+ population: a call to action in the European Society of Cardiology

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Capture in Cardiovascular Care

Advancing Data Collection of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Cardiology

Understanding and Addressing LGBTQ+ Cancer Health Disparities

State of the Nation's Cardiovascular Health and Targeting Health Equity in the United States: A Narrative Review

Unique Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Hispanic Individuals

Achieving 2S/LGBTQ+ Health Equity Requires Grappling With the Structural Drivers of Poor Health in Sexual and Gender Minorities

Data, Discrimination, and Harm: LGBTQI People Left Behind

Abstract HUP6: Ideal Cardiovascular Health and the Intersectionality of Race/Ethnicity and Sexual Identity

Chronic Health Conditions, Disability, and Physical and Cognitive Limitations Among LGBTQ+ Cancer Survivors

Digestive Health in Sexual and Gender Minority Populations

Race, Racism, and Cardiovascular Health: Applying a Social Determinants of Health Framework to Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease

Sexual Minority Status Disparities in Life's Essential 8 and Life's Simple 7 Cardiovascular Health Scores: A French Nationwide Population‐Based Study

Fear and Resilience: A Modified Consensual Qualitative Research Study of LGBTQ+ Health and the COVID-19 Pandemic

LGBTQ population health policy advocacy

Neurological care for LGBT+ people

Chronic Illness Perceptions and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Behaviors in Black and Latinx Sexual Minority Men with HIV: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Health Disparities Among Sexual Gender Minority Women in the United States: A Population-Based Study

The sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) medical trainee: the journey through medical education

Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Transgender Patients Presenting for Gender-Affirming Care