It's the will, not the skill: How malleability narratives affect Belgian adolescents' academic development
Sarah Devos Erica Scharrer Steven Eggermont Femke Konings Laura Vandenbosch a Media Psychology Lab,KU Leuven,Leuven,Belgiumb Department of Communication,University of Massachusetts,Amherst,USASarah Devos is a researcher at the School for Media Psychology Lab of KU Leuven. Her research interests concern the relations between adolescents and young adults' (social) media use and well-being. Her PhD project specifically focuses on the malleability of success and happiness in traditional and social media and the consequences for adolescents' mental well-being.Erica Scharrer is a professor and chair at the Department of Communication of UMass Amherst. Her research focuses on media content,opinions of media,media effects,and media literacy,particularly regarding gender and/or aggression. She is also interested in the role of media in the lives of children and adolescents,and studies young people's responses to media literacy education.Steven Eggermont is a full-time professor at the Media Psychology Lab of KU Leuven. His research focuses on the media use of children and adolescents,sexual media contents,media use and health behaviors,and the effects of media exposure on attitudes and behaviors.Femke Konings is a postdoctoral researcher at the Media Psychology Lab of KU Leuven. Her research interests concern the relations between young adults' social media use and well-being. She specifically focusses on disentangling the associations between the use of mobile dating applications and the consequences for young adults' mental wellbeing and identity developmentLaura Vandenbosch is an associate professor and Director of the Media Psychology of KU Leuven (BOF-ZAP research professorship grant). The relationship between media and wellbeing is the core subject of her research,leading to international publications in several fields including developmental psychology,sexology,body image,social relationships,and communication theory.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2024.2410897
IF: 2.716
2024-11-04
Journal of Children and Media
Abstract:The current experimental study among 451 Belgian adolescents examined how televised narratives that suggest that academic performance can change with hard work and effort (i.e. malleability narrative) compared to narratives that focus on inability to change academic performances (i.e. fixed narrative) differently affect academic self-perceptions, motivation, and well-being. Additionally, this study explores how adolescents' reactions to malleability versus fixed narratives may differ based on their academic self-discrepancy levels (that is, the difference between their perceptions of current and ideal academic performance). According to the results, exposure to a malleability narrative, as opposed to a fixed narrative, increased adolescents' confidence in their academic abilities (i.e. academic " can-self "), which resulted in a stronger motivation for academic engagement. However, adolescents exposed to a malleability narrative also reported feeling more academic performance pressure than those exposed to a fixed narrative. No moderation effects were found for academic self-discrepancy levels. Televised malleability narratives can thus be beneficial to adolescents' academic self-perceptions and development, but can simultaneously be harmful to well-being as adolescents feel pressure to excel academically, as well.
social sciences, interdisciplinary,communication