Anti-drug Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization
Heather Myler,João Pedras-Vasconcelos,Kelli Phillips,Charles Scott Hottenstein,Paul Chamberlain,Viswanath Devanaryan,Carol Gleason,Joanne Goodman,Marta Starcevic Manning,Shobha Purushothama,Susan Richards,Honglue Shen,Jad Zoghbi,Lakshmi Amaravadi,Troy Barger,Steven Bowen,Ronald R. Bowsher,Adrienne Clements-Egan,Dong Geng,Theresa J. Goletz,George R. Gunn,William Hallett,Michael E. Hodsdon,Brian M. Janelsins,Vibha Jawa,Szilard Kamondi,Susan Kirshner,Daniel Kramer,Meina Liang,Kathryn Lindley,Susana Liu,ZhenZhen Liu,Jim McNally,Alvydas Mikulskis,Robert Nelson,Mohsen Rajabi Ahbari,Qiang Qu,Jane Ruppel,Veerle Snoeck,An Song,Haoheng Yan,Mark Ware
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-021-00649-y
2021-12-01
The AAPS Journal
Abstract:Abstract Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized anti-drug antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. Following debate at the American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences National Biotechnology Conference, a group was formed to address these gaps. Over the last 3 years, 44 members from 29 organizations (including 5 members from Europe and 10 members from FDA) discussed gaps in understanding immunogenicity assay requirements and have developed harmonization tools for use by industry scientists to facilitate filings to health authorities. Herein, this team provides testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) pre-study validation cut point; (2) in-study cut points, including procedures for applying cut points to mixed populations; (3) system suitability control criteria for in-study plate acceptance; (4) assay sensitivity, including the selection of an appropriate low positive control; (5) specificity, including drug and target tolerance; (6) sample stability that reflects sample storage and handling conditions; (7) assay selectivity to matrix components, including hemolytic, lipemic, and disease state matrices; (8) domain specificity for multi-domain therapeutics; (9) and minimum required dilution and extraction-based sample processing for titer reporting. Graphical Abstract