Abstract:This paper examines recent English publications regarding Qing history, especially focusing on the works of Mark Elliott and Pamela Crossley, the two leading scholars in the field. “New Qing History” – a name for recent scholarship on Qing history, which has shared common interests in Manchu language materials and Inner Asian tradition in the Qing empire – has been widely discussed and read in Korea. This group of scholars has challenged the theory of sinicization, and instead highlighted important roles of non-Han people who have long been considered as “inferior barbarians,” especially the Manchus and Mongols, in Chinese history. There are also some disagreements found among these scholars, most notably regarding the question of how to understand ethnicity in the Qing history. Mark Elliott argues that Manchu ethnic identity had played a decisive role in the formation of the Qing state, and the distinctive cultural traits of the Manchu people – or the Manchuness in his word – had remained throughout the dynasty. Pamela Crossley refutes Elliott’s idea that many elements of the Manchuness, such as frugality and martial skills, were in fact products of the Qing imperial ideology. She addresses that the Manchu identity were constantly transformed by the Qing court’s interests. If Elliott explains the Qing history as the Manchu empire, Crossley offers the Qing empire, which included not only the Manchus but other imperial constituencies, such as the Mongol, Tibetan, and Uyghur. Understandings of these divergences in “New Qing History” help examine the ways in which the Qing made its relationships with neighboring countries. As long as the Qing had been transformed itself, its foreign policies changed as well. If the Qing court modified the history of the Manchus and the Mongols, so did to the Choson. As such, various questions raised in “New Qing History” can shed new light on the understanding of the Qing and Choson relationship.

Presidential Address: Reenvisioning the Qing: The Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History

Qian Xun: "Extraordinary Talent" in Diplomatic History of Late Qing Dynasty——Concurrently on Untenable Assumption of "Zhang Zhidong's Imperial Dream"

Reflections upon the Centennial Abolition of the Imperial Examination System

Foreign Education as Viewed by the Chinese in the Late Qing Dynasty——Observations and Thoughts on the Western Education Held by the Diplomats who Went Abroad for the First Time

How to write Chinese history in the twenty-first century: The impact of the “New Qing History” studies and Chinese responses

The Change of Diplomatic Ideas in the Late Qing Dynasty (1840-1914): A Literature Review

Reflections on the "New Qing History" School in the United States

The Western Learning into the East and the Cultural Changes of the Qing Dynasty

"History" in "the Policy Questions": an Aspect Concerning the Continuation of the "historical Memories" in Late Qing Dynasty

The Re-understanding of the Revolution of 1911

The Qing Dynasty’s Empire Governance, the Revolution of 1911, and China’s Unitary Multinational State Theory

The Late Qing Dynasty Diplomatic Transformation: Analysis from an Ideational Perspective

Repositioning History for the Future ‐ Recent Academic Debates in China

New Qing History School: The Manchu Turn in American Historiography

Four Basic Dimensions for Understanding the Culture from the Qing Dynasty

The reception of the “New Qing History” in China: confrontation between global and nationalist historical narratives

The Manchu Empire or The Qing Empire? - A Critical Review on ‘New Qing History’ -

The Imperial Edict of Abdication by Qing Emperor:from the Perspective of Political Constitutional Jurisprudence

Distress and Struggle: Division, Feature and Theoretical Breakthrough in History of Ideas in Qing Dynasty

New Qing History and the Problem of “Chinese Empire”—Another Impact and Response?