Abstract:Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a backup plan to offset some aspects of anthropogenic climate change if timely CO2 emission reductions fail to materialize. Modeling studies have shown that there are trade-offs between changes in temperature and hydrological cycle in response to solar geoengineering. Here we investigate the possibility of stabilizing both global mean temperature and precipitation simultaneously by combining two geoengineering approaches: stratospheric sulfate aerosol increase (SAI) that deflects sunlight to space and cirrus cloud thinning (CCT) that enables more longwave radiation to escape to space. Using the slab ocean configuration of National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Earth System Model, we simulate SAI by uniformly adding sulfate aerosol in the upper stratosphere and CCT by uniformly increasing cirrus cloud ice particle falling speed. Under an idealized warming scenario of abrupt quadrupling of atmospheric CO2, we show that by combining appropriate amounts of SAI and CCT geoengineering, global mean (or land mean) temperature and precipitation can be restored simultaneously to preindustrial levels. However, compared to SAI, cocktail geoengineering by mixing SAI and CCT does not markedly improve the overall similarity between geoengineered climate and preindustrial climate on regional scales. Some optimal spatially nonuniform mixture of SAI with CCT might have the potential to better mitigate climate change at both the global and regional scales. Plain Language Summary Increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide cause increase in both global temperatures and precipitation. Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a means to counteract this climate change by deliberately deflecting more sunlight from the Earth's climate system. Numerous climate modeling studies have shown that proposed solar geoengineering schemes, such as injection of sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere, can cool climate, but the amount of precipitation change per degree of temperature change is greater than that for CO2, meaning that such proposals cannot simultaneously globally restore both average temperatures and average precipitation. It has also been suggested that the Earth could be cooled by thinning cirrus clouds, but the amount of precipitation change per degree of temperature change for this method is less than that for CO2. Our climate modeling study shows, for the first time, that a cocktail of these two approaches would decrease precipitation and temperature in the same ratios as they are increased by CO2, which would allow simultaneous recovery of preindustrial temperature and precipitation in a high CO2 world at global scale. We show that although the average temperatures and precipitation can be recovered at global scale, substantial differences between the geoengineered and natural climates persist at regional scale.

Considering intentional stratospheric dehydration for climate benefits

The Climatic Effects of Hygroscopic Growth of Sulfate Aerosols in the Stratosphere

Changes in Hadley Circulation and Intertropical Convergence Zone under Strategic Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering

Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols

Can We Modify Stratospheric Water Vapor by Deliberate Cloud Seeding?

Stratospheric Albedo Modification by Aerosol Injection

Kicking the Can Down the Road: Understanding the Effects of Delaying the Deployment of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

Climate System Response to Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols: Sensitivity to Altitude of Aerosol Layer

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Geoengineering Would Mitigate Greenhouse Gas‐Induced Drying and Affect Global Drought Patterns

Simulated Climate Effects of Desert Irrigation Geoengineering

Different Strategies of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Would Significantly Affect Climate Extreme Mitigation

Simultaneous stabilization of global temperature and precipitation through cocktail geoengineering

Atmospheric rivers impacting western North America in a world with climate intervention

Identifying Climate Impacts From Different Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Strategies in UKESM1

Speed of environmental change frames relative ecological risk in climate change and climate intervention scenarios

Microphysical Interactions Determine the Effectiveness of Solar Radiation Modification via Stratospheric Solid Particle Injection

Stratospheric water vapor affecting atmospheric circulation

Projected Future Changes in Extreme Precipitation over China under Stratospheric Aerosol Intervention

Side Effects of Sulfur‐Based Geoengineering Due To Absorptivity of Sulfate Aerosols

Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering

An assessment of the infrastructural and temporal barriers constraining a near-term implementation of a global stratospheric aerosol injection program