Abstract:Relational cognition—the ability to infer relationships that generalize to novel combinations of objects—is fundamental to human and animal intelligence. Despite this importance, it remains unclear how relational cognition is implemented in the brain due in part to a lack of hypotheses and predictions at the levels of collective neural activity and behavior. Here we discovered, analyzed, and experimentally tested neural networks (NNs) that perform transitive inference (TI), a classic relational task (if A > B and B > C, then A > C). We found NNs that (i) generalized perfectly, despite lacking overt transitive structure prior to training, (ii) generalized when the task required working memory (WM), a capacity thought to be essential to inference in the brain, (iii) emergently expressed behaviors long observed in living subjects, in addition to a novel order-dependent behavior, and (iv) expressed different task solutions yielding alternative behavioral and neural predictions. Further, in a large-scale experiment, we found that human subjects performing WM-based TI showed behavior inconsistent with a class of NNs that characteristically expressed an intuitive task solution. These findings provide neural insights into a classical relational ability, with wider implications for how the brain realizes relational cognition. The ability to infer underlying relationships in the world—or "relational cognition"—is fundamental to both human and animal intelligence. Despite this importance, it remains generally unknown how relational abilities are realized in the brain. Addressing this lack of knowledge requires generating testable hypotheses regarding the activity of neurons when relationships are inferred. In this study, we discovered artificial neural networks that perform transitive inference (TI), a classic relational task that has the form "if A > B and B > C, then A > C." We found that these neural networks show behavioral patterns that match those seen in humans and animals performing TI, and, further, performed TI in different ways, thereby providing different testable hypotheses regarding neural activity. We also conducted a large-scale behavioral study in humans, which suggested systematic differences in biological accuracy across the neural networks. These findings provide new hypotheses and insights regarding how TI, and relational abilities more generally, can be realized in the brain.

Relational reasoning and generalization using non-symbolic neural networks

Relational Constraints On Neural Networks Reproduce Human Biases towards Abstract Geometric Regularity

Learning Algebraic Representation for Systematic Generalization in Abstract Reasoning

A mathematical theory of relational generalization in transitive inference

Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks

Emergent neural dynamics and geometry for generalization in a transitive inference task

Better Set Representations For Relational Reasoning

A Relational Inductive Bias for Dimensional Abstraction in Neural Networks

Neural networks for abstraction and reasoning: Towards broad generalization in machines

A Feature-based Generalizable Prediction Model for Both Perceptual and Abstract Reasoning

Learning Algebraic Representation for Abstract Spatial-Temporal Reasoning

Learning Representations for Reasoning: Generalizing Across Diverse Structures

Enhancing Neural Mathematical Reasoning by Abductive Combination with Symbolic Library

Human-Like Geometric Abstraction in Large Pre-trained Neural Networks

A Novel Neural-symbolic System under Statistical Relational Learning

Representations and generalization in artificial and brain neural networks

Systematic Reasoning About Relational Domains With Graph Neural Networks

Best of Both Worlds: A Pliable and Generalizable Neuro-Symbolic Approach for Relation Classification

When can transformers reason with abstract symbols?

Relational inductive bias for physical construction in humans and machines

Neural Networks Enhancement with Logical Knowledge