Human performance in predicting enhancement quality of gliomas using gadolinium‐free MRI sequences

Aynur Azizova,Ivar J. H. G. Wamelink,Yeva Prysiazhniuk,Marcus Cakmak,Elif Kaya,Jan Petr,Frederik Barkhof,Vera C. Keil
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.13233
2024-09-21
Journal of Neuroimaging
Abstract:Background and Purpose To develop and test a decision tree for predicting contrast enhancement quality and shape using precontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences in a large adult‐type diffuse glioma cohort. Methods Preoperative MRI scans (development/optimization/test sets: n = 31/38/303, male = 17/22/189, mean age = 52/59/56.7 years, high‐grade glioma = 22/33/249) were retrospectively evaluated, including pre‐ and postcontrast T1‐weighted, T2‐weighted, fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery, and diffusion‐weighted imaging sequences. Enhancement prediction decision tree (EPDT) was developed using development and optimization sets, incorporating four imaging features: necrosis, diffusion restriction, T2 inhomogeneity, and nonenhancing tumor margins. EPDT accuracy was assessed on a test set by three raters of variable experience. True enhancement features (gold standard) were evaluated using pre‐ and postcontrast T1‐weighted images. Statistical analysis used confusion matrices, Cohen's/Fleiss' kappa, and Kendall's W. Significance threshold was p
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,clinical neurology,neuroimaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?