Detection of antibody against hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) virus in sera of house rats captured in port areas of Japan.
Ç. Morita,K. Sugiyama,Y. Matsuura,T. Kitamura,T. Komatsu,Y. Akao,W. Jitsukawa,H. Sakakibara
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7883/YOKEN1952.36.55
1983-02-01
Abstract:Three types of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS), i.e., urban, rural and laboratory types, have been observed in Japan (Tamura, Yatsukura and Okano, 1979; Kawamata, 1981; Umenai et al., 1979). The laboratory-type outbreaks were exclusively associated with laboratory rats (Umenai et al., 1979) and the rural type was suspected of Microtus or A podemus-borne (Umenai et al., 1981). An urban-type outbreak with more than 100 cases of HFRS occurred from 1960 to 1972 in the central area of Osaka City where there were no wild Microtus or A podemus species (Lee et al., 1979). Nevertheless, house rats were assumed to be the reservoir without any further epizootical survey. Recently, a mildtype infection in urban areas in China was related to house rats (Xu et al., 1982; Hang et al., 1982). In adition, house rats captured in port areas in the United States, i.e., New Orleans, Philadelphia and Houston, were found to have antibody against Hantaan virus (Tsai et al., 1982; LeDuc et al., 1982). The sera of house rats (R. norvegicus and R. rattus) collected in the port areas of Kobe and Yokohama during the period from 1978 to 1980 were examined by the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) method described previously (Kitamura et al., 1983). The antigen preparations used were smears of VERO-E6 cells infected with SR-i 1 strain HFRS virus at the 7th passage in these cells after