A comparative study of an advanced skin imaging system in diagnosing facial pigmentary and inflammatory conditions

Yu-Wen Huang,Walter Arkesteijn,Yi-Jing Lai,Chau Yee Ng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63274-7
IF: 4.6
2024-06-27
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Visual assessment, while the primary method for pigmentation and erythema evaluation in clinical practice, is subjective, time-consuming, and may lead to variability in observations among clinicians. Objective and quantitative techniques are required for a precise evaluation of the disease's severity and the treatment's efficacy. This research examines the precision and utility of a newly developed skin imaging system in assessing pigmentation and erythema. Sixty participants were recruited, and their facial images were analyzed with the new OBSERV 520 x skin imaging system, compared to DERMACATCH for regional analysis and VISIA for full-face examination. The degree of skin pigmentation was clinically graded using the MASI scores evaluated by dermatologists. The data revealed positive correlations between the novel skin imaging system and the two conventional instruments in quantifying pigmentation and erythema, whether in regional or full-face analysis. Furthermore, the new skin imaging system positively correlated with the clinical MASI scores (r = 0.4314, P < 0.01). In contrast, our study found no significant correlation between the traditional system and clinical assessment, indicating a more substantial capacity for hyperpigmentation assessment in the new system. Our study validates the innovative skin imaging system's accuracy in evaluating pigmentation and erythema, demonstrating its feasibility for quantitative evaluation in both clinical and research purposes.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the subjectivity and variability in the assessment of skin pigmentation and inflammatory conditions. Specifically, although visual assessment is the main method for evaluating pigmentation and erythema in clinical practice, this method is highly subjective, time - consuming and may lead to differences in observations among different doctors. Therefore, researchers need an objective and quantitative technique to accurately assess the severity of diseases and the treatment effects. To meet this challenge, this study examined the accuracy and practicality of a newly - developed skin imaging system (OBSERV 520x) in evaluating pigmentation and erythema, and compared it with two traditional non - invasive instruments (Dermacatch and VISIA). The study recruited 60 participants with facial pigmentation or inflammatory conditions and analyzed their facial images to verify the accuracy and reliability of the new system. The main objectives of the study include: 1. **Evaluating the accuracy of the new system**: Verify the accuracy of the new system in evaluating pigmentation and erythema by comparing it with traditional instruments. 2. **Evaluating the practicality of the new system**: Explore the application potential of the new system in clinical and research settings. 3. **Verifying the correlation between the new system and clinical assessment**: Verify the clinical value of the new system by comparing it with the assessment results of clinicians using the MASI score. The study results show that the new system has a significant correlation with traditional instruments in evaluating pigmentation and erythema, and has a stronger correlation with the clinical MASI score in some parameters (such as the B2 parameter), indicating that the new system has higher accuracy in evaluating the severity of pigmentation. These results provide strong support for the clinical application of the new system.