Association Between the Overall Risk of Prostate Cancer and Use of Calcium Channel Blockers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Hui Yang,Yahui Yu,Xiaopeng Hu,Wei Wang,Xiaoyong Yang,Hang Liu,Liang Ren,Xiaodong Zhang,Xin Feng,Lihong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.06.021
IF: 3.637
2020-09-01
Clinical Therapeutics
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are now commonly prescribed to treat hypertension as a first-line drug therapy, their impact on prostate cancer (PCa) is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the association between CCB use and the overall risk of PCa.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched up to December 26, 2019, stratified according to statistical method of outcome [odd ratios (ORs), relative ratios (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs)] and cumulative duration of CCB use. The quality assessment of included studies was evaluated by using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Fixed effects models were used to study the association between CCB use and the risk of PCa. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified by using Cochran's Q-statistic and <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> statistics. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding the studies one by one, and publication bias was analyzed by using funnel plots.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Findings</h3><p>Nineteen studies with 1,418,407 patients were identified for inclusion in the meta-analysis, which was based on the comparison of cohort studies, nested case–control studies, and case–control studies. Pooled estimates showed a RR of 1.08 (95% CI, 1.05–1.11; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001) and a HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02–1.13; <em>P</em> = 0.008) for association between CCB use and the risk of PCa. In addition, the results of subgroup analysis showed that CCB users of &lt;5 years had an 8% increased overall risk of PCa (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04–1.12; <em>P</em> = 0.0001), and CCB users of 5–10 years had a 13% increased overall risk of PCa (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04–1.23; <em>P</em> = 0.003).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Implications</h3><p>CCB use had a tendency to increase the overall risk of PCa, and cumulative duration of CCB use might also be positively correlated with the overall risk of PCa.</p>
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?