Clinical and Immune Effects of Peri‐Transplantation JAK Inhibition for Myelofibrosis

Kristin Rathje,Nico Gagelmann,Anita Badbaran,Claudia Langebrake,Adrin Dadkhah,Johanna Richter,Radwan Massoud,Mathias Schäfersküpper,Franziska E. Marquard,Sofia Oechsler,Evgeny Klyuchnikov,Ina Rudolph,Silke Heidenreich,Christian Niederwieser,Catherina Lueck,Dietlinde Janson,Christine Wolschke,Boris Fehse,Francis Ayuk,Nicolaus Kröger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27529
IF: 13.265
2024-11-22
American Journal of Hematology
Abstract:Despite the introduction of JAK inhibitors, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with myelofibrosis but has considerable treatment‐related complications. Whether the incorporation of JAK inhibition into the transplant algorithm leads to improved outcomes is still unclear. Here, we analyzed different transplant platforms in myelofibrosis patients undergoing a first transplant, comparing immune profiles and outcomes of (1) 33 patients continuing JAK inhibition at start of conditioning until stable engraftment (PERI‐group), (2) 38 patients receiving JAK inhibition prior to transplant until start of conditioning (PRE‐group), and (3) 38 patients that had never received JAK inhibition (NON‐group). Patients in the PERI‐group showed significantly higher early B‐cell recovery as well as significantly increased late recovery of gamma‐delta T cells and NK cells. We observed excellent neutrophil and platelet engraftment (100% for both) in the PERI‐group and no hematotoxic effects or increased rates of infections following peri‐transplant JAK inhibition. Cumulative incidence of acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD) grade II‐IV at day 100 after transplant was 15% in the PERI‐group versus 29% in the PRE‐group versus 34% in the NON‐group. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year after transplant was 9% in the PERI‐group compared with 16% in the PRE‐group and 18% in the NON‐group. In conclusion, peri‐transplant JAK inhibition was feasible with promising engraftment and acute GvHD rates, though deserves further investigation.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?