Lens Implant Opacification
Xueting Pei,Yongzhen Bao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.024
IF: 14.277
2011-01-01
Ophthalmology
Abstract:As we know, intraocular lens (IOL) opacification is a rare and significant complication of IOL implantation surgery, and in most cases, these IOLs have to be explanted. IOL opacification can develop with many kinds of IOLs.1Mamalis N. Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention–2001 survey update.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28: 2193-2201Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar The mean interval between IOL implantation of the Hydroview lens (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) and the diagnosis of opacification was 19.8±11.9 months (range, 5.0–48.0 months), and for the MemoryLens (CIBA Vision, Duluth, GA), the interval was a little longer (25.8±11.9 months).2Neuhann I.M. Werner L. Izak A.M. et al.Late postoperative opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel) intraocular lens: a clinicopathological analysis of 106 explants.Ophthalmology. 2004; 111: 2094-2101Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (126) Google Scholar We report the case of a Chinese patient with posterior surface opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic IOL implanted 7 years ago. This patient was 70-year-old man. He had uneventful phacoemulsification with posterior chamber foldable single-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOL (Isotechnics, MDR Medical Corp., Clearwater, FL) implantation of his right eye in May 2002. He had pathological myopia, and scleral buckling was performed for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in December 1985. Before cataract surgery, his best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/60 in the right eye. Postoperative BCVA was 2/6. He had a quiet eye for at least 5 years. The patient was seen again complaining of blurred vision of 1 year duration in February 2009. BCVA was 5/60 in the right eye. A uniformly granular white opacification was observed on the posterior surface of the IOL. An IOL exchange with an acrylic hydrophobic IOL (Figure 1, available at http://aaojournal.org) was performed in May 2009. Currently, BCVA remains 2/6 in the right eye. The posterior surface deposits of his explanted IOL were analyzed using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) coupled with scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The deposits appear on the posterior surface of optic and 2 loops. The anterior surface, extending over the edges onto the peripheral posterior surface, was in general, free of any deposits. Scanning electron microscope photographs demonstrated the diameter of the deposit to be about 10 μm. The deposits have the tendency to be confluent, forming a dense crust with cerebriform structures toward the outside. Transmission electron microscope photographs showed crystal-like substance around a core in the internal deposit (Figure 2, available at http://aaojournal.org). The EDS performed precisely on the deposits located with scanning electron microscopic examination revealed the presence of higher calcium and phosphate peaks and lower carbon and oxygen peaks. Our case displayed similar morphological features to the surface deposits seen with the MemoryLens hydrophilic acrylic IOL opacification implanted before 1999.2Neuhann I.M. Werner L. Izak A.M. et al.Late postoperative opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel) intraocular lens: a clinicopathological analysis of 106 explants.Ophthalmology. 2004; 111: 2094-2101Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (126) Google Scholar Components of the deposits in our case included calcium, phosphorus, carbon, and oxygen, which was similar to other reports. The quantity of elemental calcium and phosphorus accounted for the main component. We believe calcification of the hydrophilic acrylic lens lead to the IOL opacification in our case. In our patient, IOL opacification developed at least 5 years after the cataract surgery according to the clinical history and eye examination, and the interval between cataract surgery and IOL explantation was 7 years. To the best our knowledge, this is the longest interval between the IOL implantation and the diagnosis of opacification. It is possible that the process of IOL opacification in this case started before the patient's vision decreased. However, the process of calcification in this case may take longer than that with other hydrophilic IOLs. We hypothesize that the residual lens epithelial cells on the posterior capsule might slowly secrete crystalline. It then took a long time for the deposition of calcium and phosphorus on the protein film, which covers the posterior surface of IOL.3Werner L. Calcification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 146: 341-343Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar Several studies have demonstrated that the eventual reaction to an IOL implanted into the eye significantly depends on protein adsorption, especially in the presence of microdefects on the polymer surfaces.4Amon M. Biocompatibility of intraocular lenses.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27: 178-179Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar After absorption, the formation of tightly bound complexes of protein and calcium could be promoted by long-chain fatty acids. The adsorption of such macromolecules could provoke the formation of a calcification nucleus.5Linnola R.J. Werner L. Pandey S.K. et al.Adhesion of fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials in pseudophakic human autopsy eyes Part 2: explanted intraocular lenses.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26: 1807-1818Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar The actual mechanism of IOL calcification remains unclear and would benefit from further study. Figure 2Scanning electron photomicrograph (A) and transmission electron photomicrograph (B) of the posterior surface of the opacified intraocular lens showing the confluent deposits and a crystal-like cone.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Late postoperative opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel) intraocular lens: A clinicopathological analysis of 106 explantsOphthalmologyVol. 111Issue 11PreviewTo report clinical, pathologic, histochemical, ultrastructural, and spectroscopic analyses of MemoryLens intraocular lenses (IOLs) explanted from patients who had visual disturbances caused by postoperative opacification of the lens optic. Full-Text PDF Lens Implant OpacificationOphthalmologyVol. 118Issue 10PreviewWe read with interest the letter Xue-Ting Pei and Yong-Zhen Bao on lens implant opacification describing a case of late onset opacification of a lens first noted 5 years after implantation.1 However, far from being a unique case, we think this highlights an underestimated problem. Other research has shown that Hydroview lenses (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) implanted prior to 2001 are still presenting with opacification.2–4 Our paper gave data on 50 opacified hydroview lenses with a mean time from implantation to assessment of 7.04 years (range, 6.43–7.49). Full-Text PDF