Abstract:Autism, Ahead of Print. As many autistic individuals report mentalizing difficulties into adulthood, the current pre-registered study investigated potential differences in belief reasoning and/or visual perspective taking between autistic and non-autistic adults. The Seeing-Believing task was administered to 121 gender-balanced participants online (57 with a self- reported diagnosis of an autism spectrum condition and 64 without), as well as Raven's Progressive Matrices (on which the groups did not significantly differ) and the Autism Spectrum Quotient. Non-autistic adults replicated previous findings with this task, revealing slower responses to belief-reasoning than to perspective-taking trials. Autistic adults did not show significantly slower or more error-prone performance during perspective taking and/or belief reasoning. In fact, the autistic group committed significantly fewer mistakes, including fewer altercentric intrusions. The main group difference in response times was a steeper increase with increasing angular disparity between self and other in the autistic group. We discuss our findings in terms of differences in self-other control, but emphasise that our findings cannot be explained in terms of simplistic deficit-based notions of autism and suggest that autistic adults might favour slightly different strategies when judging another's perspective or belief.Lay abstractMany autistic individuals report difficulties in social situations, where they are required to think about what goes on in others' minds. These states of the mind can include how others perceive the world around them, their beliefs, or their desires. While research has shown that autistic children could be delayed in developing their full capacity in this regard, less is known about how adults process others' experiences and beliefs. Here we used a novel task and asked adults to participate online. Participants self-reported whether they had been diagnosed with autism or not and we split them into two groups depending on their response. We also asked participants to fill in a self-report questionnaire about social preferences and habits and we also asked them to conduct a test of their nonverbal reasoning ability. Importantly, the autistic and the non-autistic groups did not differ in their nonverbal reasoning abilities, and on our task, we observed that the autistic group committed fewer mistakes than the non-autistic group. Autistic participants were particularly fast and made fewer mistakes on those responses that overlapped with their own view and belief of reality. In conclusion, our findings do not support a simple view of autism in terms of deficits in either social or more general thinking abilities. Instead, autistic adults might favour slightly different ways of thinking about other's experiences and beliefs that is more firmly linked to their own experience and knowledge.

Mock juror perceptions of an adult autistic witness: effect of diagnostic label and witness intermediary presence

Mock Juror Perceptions of Eyewitness Reports Given by Children with Intellectual Disabilities

Police suspect interviews with autistic adults: The impact of truth telling versus deception on testimony

Perceptions of autistic and non-autistic adults in employment interviews: The role of impression management

Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom

Effects of questioning styles and defendant's intellectual disability on the public perceptions of a police interview and guilty verdict

The contributory role of an autistic presentation to miscarriage of justice in a high-profile murder case in New Zealand

Mock jurors' evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions

The Impact of Mental Health Labels, Gender, and Relationship Type on Mock Jurors' Perceptions and Verdicts in a Case of Intimate Partner Violence

The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making

Theory of Mind and Social Informant Discrepancy in Autism

Investigating visual perspective taking and belief reasoning in autistic adults: A pre-registered online study

Psychometric properties of the mock interview rating scale for autistic transition-age youth

Sex offenders’ perceptions of the effectiveness and fairness of humanity, dominance, and displaying an understanding of cognitive distortions in police interviews: A vignette study

A patient`s trajectory with autism spectrum disorder leading to forensic psychiatric institutionalisation

Judgments of social awkwardness from brief exposure to children with and without high-functioning autism

Juror Perceptions of Bystander and Victim Intoxication by Different Substances

Mental health in the courtroom: how victim mental health status impacts juror decision-making in a rape case

Psychological analysis of child witness testimony

Identification and support of autistic individuals within the UK Criminal Justice System: a practical approach based upon professional consensus with input from lived experience

What do we know about autism and policing globally? Preliminary findings from an international effort to examine autism and the criminal justice system