Abstract:Background. Complications are the main concern of patients and surgeons when considering spine surgery. One of the risk factors for complications in the thoracic and lumbar spinal segments, as well as segments adjacent to those with fusion, is changes in sagittal spinal-pelvic balance. Objective: to determine the effect of muscle changes that occur during surgical access for posterior bisegmental LIV-SI fusion on the load of the iliac crest surface in the sacroiliac joint. Materials and methods. Dynamic motion simulation modeling was performed using OpenSim software with the use of additional programs to calculate loading forces. The complete model of the human musculoskeletal system was taken as a basis. To compare the load force, four models were created: 1 — basic, all spinal motion segments are fully functional, 2 — fixation without changing the anatomical curves of the spine, 3 — fixation in the position of hyperlordosis; 4 — fixation with reproduction of hyperlordosis. For models 2–4, changes in the muscles were made that correspond to the effects of surgical posterior access to the lumbar spine for posterior instrumented fusion LIV-SI. The load on the area of interest was measured as the value of the projection of the force vector depending on the angle of torso inclination as a percentage of body weight. Results. Muscle strength and function were the same for all types of instrumental spinal fusion, and trauma during access was not taken into account. In model 1 (normal) with the upright position, the projection of the load force falls on the center of gravity of the vertebra. When tilted, the load force in the sagittal direction acts exclusively on the anterior ilium with a slight shift of 10 % forward. In normosthenic and hyperlordotic fixation, there is a shift in the projection of the load force on the posterior iliac crest in the upright position and its displacement to the center with the tilt. The displacement of the load center with the upright position in normosthenic fixation is associated with the exclusion of some extensor muscles from the calculation of fibers, which reduces their total strength and leads to sagittal imbalance with an increase in lordosis. Hypolordotic fixation (model 4) slightly shifts the projection of the load force in the upright position (by 3 %) and approaches the normal values of model 1 when tilted. Regarding vertical loads, for all models with muscle integrity impairment (models 2, 3, 4), the load in the upright position is greatly increased — on average by 60 % compared to the norm, with a decrease in body weight by 40–45 % when tilted. Conclusions. It has been proved that the load force on the surface of the iliac crest in the sacroiliac joint depends on the angle of instrumental fusion performed. The greatest changes are observed with the displacement of the load center during upright standing in the sagittal direction. In normosthenic and hyperlordotic fixation with decreased back muscle strength, there is a load shift to the posterior part of the iliac crest. In hypolordotic fixation, the center of the load remains close to the central position. The distribution of the load in the vertical direction is primarily influenced by the reduced strength of the back muscles, which increases the load by 60 %.

The effects of topping-off instrumentation on biomechanics of sacroiliac joint after lumbosacral fusion

A Biomechanical Comparison of Two Different Topping-off Devices and Their Influence on the Sacroiliac Joint Following Lumbosacral Fusion Surgery

Topping-off surgery vs posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a finite element analysis

[Finite Element Analysis of Lumbar Fusion and Topping-off Surgery].

Biomechanical Effects of Multi-segment Fixation on Lumbar Spine and Sacroiliac Joints: A Finite Element Analysis

Topping-off technique prevents aggravation of degeneration of adjacent segment fusion revealed by retrospective and finite element biomechanical analysis

Topping-off Surgery Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion for Combined One-level Spondylolisthesis and Adjacent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Comparative Study of Clinical Efficacy and Radiographic Outcomes With a Two-year Follow-up

The Effect of Topping-off Surgery on Preventing Adjacent Segment Degeneration, a Retrospective Study

Comparison of Topping-off and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Lumbar Degenerative Disease: a Retrospective Study.

Lumbar Fusion Including Sacroiliac Joint Fixation Increases The Stress And Angular Motion At The Hip Joint: A Finite Element Study

Effect of Lumbar Fusion and Pelvic Fixation Rigidity on Hip Joint Stress: A Finite Element Analysis

Effects of dynamic and rigid implantation on biomechanical characteristics of different sagittal alignment lumbar after single- or double-level spinal fixations: a finite-element modeling study

Stability and Instrumentation Stresses Among Sacropelvic Fixation Techniques With Novel Porous Fusion/Fixation Implants: A Finite Element Study

Biomechanical Analysis of Lumbar Fusion with Proximal Interspinous Process Device Implantation

Study of load in the sacroiliac joint during dynamic simulation of movements in the lumbar spine on skeletal muscle models after posterior bisegmental fusion

Biomechanical evaluation of multiple pelvic screws and multirod construct for the augmentation of lumbosacral junction in long spinal fusion surgery

Biomechanical characteristics of a novel interspinous distraction fusion device in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a finite element analysis

Biomechanical Comparison of Spinal Fusion Methods Using Interspinous Process Compressor and Pedicle Screw Fixation System Based on Finite Element Method

Sacroiliac Joint Degeneration After Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion Surgery-A Comparative Study of the Number of Fused Segments and Sacral Fusion

Biomechanical Analysis of Adjacent Segments after Spinal Fusion Surgery Using a Geometrically Parametric Patient-Specific Finite Element Model

Biomechanical analysis of lumbar spine with interbody fusion surgery and U-shaped lumbar interspinous spacers