Abstract:Social forestry has been widely promoted as a policy strategy to improve the livelihoods of rural communities by granting them rights or permits to manage forests. How it is mainstreamed and how the related policy options are exercised and implemented have become vibrant areas of scientific inquiries. This study analyzes the formal policy formulation processes of a new social forestry scheme in Indonesia called Izin Pemanfaatan Hutan Perhutanan Sosial (IPHPS) (Permits for Social Forestry Concession). Granted to local farmers, IPHPS is a long-term utilization permit for forestland that is currently managed by the state-owned Perhutani enterprise. It is unique in Indonesia, as no permit-based social forestry has been implemented in forests under another right (overlapping permits). This research analyzes why and how IPHPS was formulated and explains why the permit-based social forestry was preferred to land distribution. Through interviews with diverse policy actors combined with literature, policy document, and regulation reviews, the degree to which nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) were involved in the policymaking is specifically assessed. Two major findings are obtained. First, although NGOs sustained a decade-long policy advocacy and played a substantial part in promoting forest tenure reforms, their direct involvement in designing the IPHPS model was limited. Former NGO activists who worked within government circles did not push substantive policy outputs, whereas others were prevented from coming to negotiation tables. Second, the new social forestry model was instead shaped by the strong interest of maintaining forest control by the state enterprise held by few individuals within and with connections to government institutions. The policy outcome itself, i.e., IPHPS social forestry, appears to represent a compromise between two extremes, i.e., the status quo of joint forest management and land distribution to local communities.

Implementing forest tenure reforms: perspectives from Indonesia’s forestry agencies

Impact of Tenure Reform on Forest Management Model: the Case of Fujian province

Only a Noise? The Role of Non-governmental Organizations in the Policy Processes of a New Social Forestry Model in Indonesia

Towards Inclusive Indonesian Forestry: An Overview of a Spatial Planning and Agrarian Perspective

Rural Women’s Agency on Forest and Land Governance in The Midst of Change: Case Study in Five Provinces

Social Forestry: The Balance between Welfare and Ecological Justice

Reviewing Social Forestry in Indonesia through an Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance

Defining the objectives and roles of Indonesian production forest governance through the multi-business forestry policy narrative

In the Question of Geospatial Information Data Use in the Forestry Legislation Making in Indonesia

Policy in Community-Based Environmental Conservation and Protection: A Comparative Study Between Brazil and Indonesia

Impact Analysis of Tenure Reform on Forest Management Model in Plain Forest Area——Investigation Report of Forest Tenure Reform in Shandong Province

Tropical Forest Landscape Restoration in Indonesia: A Review

Collective Forest Tenure Reform:Assessment of Motivation,Characteristics and Performance

Analysis on the Performance of Collective Forest Tenure Reform

Improving compliance around protected areas through fair administration of rules

Making Network Governance Work in Forest Land-Use Policy in the Local Government

Gender power relations in development planning for forest and watershed management in Lampung, Indonesia

Challenges to smallholder forestry policy reform on a postindustrial logging frontier: lessons from the Amazon estuary

Testing and Enhancing the 8R Framework of Responsible Land Management with Documented Strategies and Effects of Land Reclamation Projects in Indonesia

Power dynamics in forest governance decentralization: the case of Kenya

Enhancing Collaborative Governance in Managing Grand Forest Park in Riau, Indonesia