Abstract:Arterial stiffness (AS) refers to the loss of arterial compliance and alterations in vessel wall properties. The study of local carotid stiffness (CS) is particularly important since carotid artery stiffening raises the risk of stroke, cognitive impairment, and dementia. So, stiffness measurement as a screening tool approach is crucial because it can reduce mortality and facilitate therapy planning. This study aims to evaluate the stiffness of the CCA using machine learning (ML) through the features of diameter change (ΔD) and stiffness parameters. This study was conducted in seven stages: data collection, preprocessing, CCA segmentation, CCA lumen diameter (DCCA) computing during cardiac cycles, denoising signals of DCCA, computational of AS parameters, and stiffness assessment using ML. The 51 videos (with 25 s) of CCA B-mode ultrasound (US) were used and analyzed. Each US video yielded approximately 750 sequential frames spanning about 24 cardiac cycles. Firstly, US preset settings with time gain compensation with a U-pattern were employed to enhance CCA segmentations. The study showed that auto region-growing, employed three times, is appropriate for segmenting walls with a short running time (4.56 s/frame). The diameter computed for frames constructs a signal (diameter signal) with noisy parts in the shape of peak variance and an un-smooth side. Among the 12 employed smoothing methods, spline fitting with a mean peak difference per cycle (MPDCY) of 0.58 pixels was the most effective for the diameter signal. The authors propose the MPDCY as a new selection criterion for smoothing methods with highly preserved peaks. The ΔD (Dsys-Ddia) determined in this study was validated by statistical analysis as a viable replacement for manual ΔD measurement. Statistical analysis was carried out by Mann-Whitney t-test with a p-value of 0.81, regression line R2 = 0.907, and there was no difference in means between the two groups for box plots. The stiffness parameters of the carotid arteries were calculated based on auto-ΔD and pulse pressure. Five ML models, including K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF), fed by distension (ΔD) and five stiffness parameters, were used to distinguish between the stiffened and un-stiffened CCA. Except for SVM, all models performed excellently in terms of specificity, sensitivity, precision, and area under the curve (AUC). In addition, the scatterplot and statistical analysis of the fed features confirm these remarkable outcomes. The scatter plot demonstrates that a linear hyperline can easily distinguish between the two classes. The statistical analysis shows that the stiffness parameters computed from the database of this work were statistically (p < 0.05) distributed into the non-stiffness and stiffness groups. The presented models are validated by applying them to additional datasets. Applying models to other datasets reveals a model performance of 100%. The proposed ML models could be applied in clinical practice to detect CS early, which is essential for preventing stroke.

The influence of aortic stiffness on carotid stiffness: computational simulations using a human aorta carotid model

Arterial stiffness identification of the human carotid artery using the stress-strain relationship in vivo.

Comparison of arterial stiffness/compliance in the ascending aorta and common carotid artery in healthy subjects and its impact on left ventricular structure and function

Carotid stiffness, extra-media thickness and visceral adiposity in young adults

Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure and Two-dimensional (axial and radial) Motion of the Carotid Artery Wall: Physiological Evaluation of Arterial Stiffness

A fluid-structure interaction study to analyze the severity of carotid artery stenosis at different locations and its effect on various hemodynamic biomarkers

Relationship Between Carotid Artery Stiffness and Retinal Arteriolar Narrowing in Healthy Middle-Aged Persons

Using in Vivo Cine and 3D Multi-Contrast MRI to Determine Human Atherosclerotic Carotid Artery Material Properties and Circumferential Shrinkage Rate and Their Impact on Stress/strain Predictions.

Influence of Rigid–Elastic Artery Wall of Carotid and Coronary Stenosis on Hemodynamics

The relative associations of aortic and carotid artery stiffness with CeVD and cognition

The Importance of Blood Rheology in Patient-Specific Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Stenotic Carotid Arteries

Influence of blood pressure and rheology on oscillatory shear index and wall shear stress in the carotid artery

Effect of linear and Mooney–Rivlin material model on carotid artery hemodynamics

Abstract 562: Human Carotid Atherosclerosis Plaque Progression and Vessel Material Stiffness at Follow Up Had Positive Correlation: An in vivo Vessel Stiffness MRI Follow Up Study

Carotid stiffness and its correlation factors in 1202 middle-aged and old people

Coupling of vessel wall morphology and function in the aorta and the carotid artery: an evaluation with MRI

In silico hemodynamical simulations show additional benefits of artery wall softening induced by antihypertensive drugs

Dynamic Effects of Aortic Arch Stiffening on Pulsatile Energy Transmission to Cerebral Vasculature as A Determinant of Brain-Heart Coupling

Fully automatic carotid arterial stiffness assessment from ultrasound videos based on machine learning

The association of structural versus load-dependent large artery stiffness mechanisms with cerebrovascular damage and cortical atrophy in humans

Hemodynamic Assessment of Severely Stenotic Carotid Arteries