Abstract:In the aftermath of the 2008 crisis, investment strategies using maximum drawdown as a risk management objective have gained popularity. A systematic approach to control the maximum drawdown is the TIPP strategy, which allows investors to limit drawdowns to a chosen pre-defined level or risk-budget by dynamically allocating wealth between the “risk-free” asset and a performance-seeking portfolio. However, a weak interest rate environment represents a burden on this kind strategy, due to an increased opportunity cost for the investor. This article illustrates innovative variants of the maximum drawdown control technique, seeking to decrease the opportunity costs of the drawdown protection as well as variations of the strategy to control maximum underperformance of benchmarked portfolios, opening new perspectives for investors in terms of loss-controlled investments. In the post-2008 era, a robust risk management process has been recognised as the basis to successful investment among best practices. In a highly uncertain environment, risk management processes should somehow address one of the main concerns of investors, namely, value protection. Loss aversion is a well documented feature of investors. Thus limiting maximum drawdown as a risk management objective is gaining popularity. This risk-metric turns out to be more intuitive to investors than volatility, for whom risk indicators should include potential cumulative losses on a portfolio. However, the current weak interest rate environment has weighted on “absolute return” investment approaches, inciting institutional investors to shift their focus towards more efficient risk management practices that do not enter in conflict with performance objectives. In this article, we propose dynamic riskbudgeting techniques to address the need for more cost-efficient (absolute) loss-controlled strategies. Furthermore, we introduce the concept of “relative” maximum drawdown1 (or maximum cumulative underperformance) and a dynamic allocation strategy that limits cumulative underperformance with respect to a given (investable) benchmark. This type of investment strategy can be of particular interest for institutional investors to enter alternative attractive investments such as emerging markets or high yield bonds, that come with an important “benchmark-risk” component. For example, while emerging market indices have outperformed developed large-cap equity indices on the long run and are expected to keep heading in the same direction, they have severely underperformed developed equity indices on several occasions. This phenomenon is particularly noticeable during market rallies, where relative cumulative underperformance can reach more than 50%2 over certain periods. Not to be confused with the standard maximum drawdown (MDD) concept, which is sometimes called relative MDD to differentiate it from its version expressed in dollar terms as opposed to relative change (returns) terms. In this article we always work with drawdowns expressed in percentage terms. See Table 4 and Figure 1 for details.

Employing behavioural portfolio theory for sustainable investment: Examining drawdown risks and ESG factors

Active Portfolio Management in the Face of ESG Uncertainty: an Agile Framework for Adaptive Investment Strategies

Short-Term Versus Long-Term Portfolio Management Strategies and the Selection of Securities

Advances in Dynamic Risk Budgeting : Efficient Control of Absolute and Relative Risks †

A novel online portfolio selection approach based on pattern matching and ESG factors

Multi-period portfolio selection with drawdown control

On Inefficiency of Markowitz-Style Investment Strategies When Drawdown is Important

Do Socially Responsible And Risk-Tailored Portfolios Win? A Comparative Analysis

Drawdown: From Practice to Theory and Back Again

Portfolio optimization for heavy-tailed assets: Extreme Risk Index vs. Markowitz

Impact of ESG Risk on Portfolio Optimization and Returns: An Analysis Using the Markowitz Model

Optimal Portfolio Strategy under Rolling Economic Maximum Drawdown Constraints

International Portfolio Selection with Exchange Rate Risk: A Behavioural Portfolio Theory Perspective

Sustainable Investing and the Cross-Section of Returns and Maximum Drawdown

Insight into the risk-resistant function of ESG performance: An organizational management perspective

An Analysis of Volatility and Risk-Adjusted Returns of ESG Indices in Developed and Emerging Economies

Sustainable development and investor confidence: The safe‐haven appeal of green‐bond issuing firms

Do green investments improve portfolio diversification? Evidence from mean conditional value-at-risk optimization

Bayesian Optimization of ESG Financial Investments

Risk Management and Return Prediction

Leptokurtic portfolio theory