Banff‐based histologic chronicity index is associated with graft failure but has poor interobserver reproducibility

Wei‐Chou Lin,Mei‐Chin Wen,Yong‐Chen Hsu,Chien‐Yi Kuo,Tai‐Di Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.15335
2024-05-30
Clinical Transplantation
Abstract:Background Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) often leads to chronic kidney allograft damage and is a critical cause of allograft failure. The Banff classification, used to diagnose AMR, has become complex and challenging for clinicians. A Banff‐based histologic chronicity index (CI) was recently proposed as a simplified prognostic indicator. Its reliability and reproducibility have not been externally validated. Methods This study investigated 71 kidney allograft biopsies diagnosed with AMR. Interobserver reproducibility of the recently proposed CI and its components (cg, cv, ct, and ci) were assessed. The association between CI and allograft failure was analyzed, and CI cut‐off values were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan–Meier estimator with log‐rank test. Results The study confirmed the association of CI with allograft failure, but also revealed that the assessment of CI varied between pathologists, impacting its reproducibility as a prognostic tool. Only 49 (69.0%) of the biopsies showed complete agreement on the proposed cut‐off value of CI
surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?