Abstract:The recent developments in quantum technology have opened up new opportunities for machine learning algorithms to assist the healthcare industry in diagnosing complex health disorders, such as heart disease. In this work, we summarize the effectiveness of QuEML in heart disease prediction. To evaluate the performance of QuEML against traditional machine learning algorithms, the Kaggle heart disease dataset was used which contains 1190 samples out of which 53% of samples are labeled as positive samples and rest 47% samples are labeled as negative samples. The performance of QuEML was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1 score, and training time against traditional machine learning algorithms. From the experimental results, it has been observed that proposed quantum approaches predicted around 50.03% of positive samples as positive and an average of 44.65% of negative samples are predicted as negative whereas traditional machine learning approaches could predict around 49.78% of positive samples as positive and 44.31% of negative samples as negative. Furthermore, the computational complexity of QuEML was measured which consumed average of 670 μs for its training whereas traditional machine learning algorithms could consume an average 862.5 μs for training. Hence, QuEL was found to be a promising approach in heart disease prediction with an accuracy rate of 0.6% higher and training time of 192.5 μs faster than that of traditional machine learning approaches.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve The main objective of this paper is to improve the accuracy and computational efficiency of heart disease prediction through Quantum Enhanced Machine Learning (QuEML) methods. Specifically: 1. **Effectiveness of Heart Disease Prediction**: - The study summarizes the effectiveness of Quantum Enhanced Machine Learning in heart disease prediction. - Experiments were conducted using the Kaggle heart disease dataset, which contains 1190 samples, with 53% of the samples labeled as positive and 47% labeled as negative. 2. **Performance Evaluation**: - The performance differences between QuEML and traditional machine learning algorithms were evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1 score, and training time. - Experimental results show that QuEML has a prediction accuracy of 50.03% for positive samples and an average prediction accuracy of 44.65% for negative samples; whereas traditional machine learning methods have a prediction accuracy of 49.78% for positive samples and 44.31% for negative samples. 3. **Computational Complexity**: - QuEML has lower computational complexity, with an average training time of 670 microseconds, compared to an average training time of 862.5 microseconds for traditional machine learning algorithms. - QuEML has higher accuracy (0.6% higher) and faster training speed (192.5 microseconds faster) than traditional machine learning methods. 4. **Motivation and Background**: - Given that heart disease is one of the leading causes of death in the world today, there is an urgent need to develop effective and accurate diagnostic systems. - Traditional machine learning algorithms face computational bottlenecks when dealing with large-scale and complex data, and the introduction of quantum computing can significantly enhance computational capabilities. - Quantum Enhanced Machine Learning leverages principles of quantum mechanics (such as qubits, superposition, entanglement, and quantum tunneling) to complete tasks faster and automatically adjust network hyperparameters. In summary, this paper aims to improve the accuracy and computational efficiency of heart disease prediction through Quantum Enhanced Machine Learning technology and to validate its advantages over traditional machine learning methods.

Revolutionizing heart disease prediction with quantum-enhanced machine learning