Abstract:We present a novel framework to automate the individual recognition of animals. Our method automatically selects and crops animals from photo catalogs, and uses photo‐matching software to identify individuals. Reliable estimates of population size and demographic rates are central to assessing the status of threatened species. However, obtaining individual‐based demographic rates requires long‐term data, which is often costly and difficult to collect. Photographic data offer an inexpensive, noninvasive method for individual‐based monitoring of species with unique markings, and could therefore increase available demographic data for many species. However, selecting suitable images and identifying individuals from photographic catalogs is prohibitively time‐consuming. Automated identification software can significantly speed up this process. Nevertheless, automated methods for selecting suitable images are lacking, as are studies comparing the performance of the most prominent identification software packages. In this study, we develop a framework that automatically selects images suitable for individual identification, and compare the performance of three commonly used identification software packages; Hotspotter, I3S‐Pattern, and WildID. As a case study, we consider the African wild dog, Lycaon pictus, a species whose conservation is limited by a lack of cost‐effective large‐scale monitoring. To evaluate intraspecific variation in the performance of software packages, we compare identification accuracy between two populations (in Kenya and Zimbabwe) that have markedly different coat coloration patterns. The process of selecting suitable images was automated using convolutional neural networks that crop individuals from images, filter out unsuitable images, separate left and right flanks, and remove image backgrounds. Hotspotter had the highest image‐matching accuracy for both populations. However, the accuracy was significantly lower for the Kenyan population (62%), compared to the Zimbabwean population (88%). Our automated image preprocessing has immediate application for expanding monitoring based on image matching. However, the difference in accuracy between populations highlights that population‐specific detection rates are likely and may influence certainty in derived statistics. For species such as the African wild dog, where monitoring is both challenging and expensive, automated individual recognition could greatly expand and expedite conservation efforts.

Deep learning-based methods for individual recognition in small birds

Removing Human Bottlenecks in Bird Classification Using Camera Trap Images and Deep Learning

Past, Present, and Future Approaches Using Computer Vision for Animal Re-Identification from Camera Trap Data

5G AI-IoT System for Bird Species Monitoring and Song Classification

Deep learning workflow to support in-flight processing of digital aerial imagery for wildlife population surveys

Towards Individual Grevy's Zebra Identification via Deep 3D Fitting and Metric Learning

A deep learning approach to detect and visualise sexual dimorphism in monomorphic species

Animal Recognition and Identification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Wildlife Monitoring

Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning

Similarity learning networks uniquely identify individuals of four marine and terrestrial species

Optimizing the automated recognition of individual animals to support population monitoring

Satellite Image Based Animal Identification System Using Deep Learning Assisted Remote Sensing Strategy

Benchmarking wild bird detection in complex forest scenes

Deep Learning Case Study on Imbalanced Training Data for Automatic Bird Identification

Individual identification in acoustic recordings

AVN: A Deep Learning Approach for the Analysis of Birdsong

A review of automatic recognition technology for bird vocalizations in the deep learning era

Deep learning for detection of bird vocalisations

Multispecies facial detection for individual identification of wildlife: a case study across ursids

Understanding the Impact of Training Set Size on Animal Re-identification