Abstract:Purpose: Reducing contrast media injection speed while maintaining iodine flux is a promising workaround to lower or avoid contrast media-related discomfort during CT examinations. This approach demands contrast media with a higher concentration to guarantee excellent image quality. It remains unclear whether these concentration changes affect the patient's experience. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different concentrations of intravenous iodinated contrast media on patient discomfort during and after contrast media delivery. Materials and methods: Patients were randomized to receive either Iomeprol 400 mg/ml (group A) or 300 mg/ml (group B) during routinely scheduled CT examinations at our department. The iodine delivery rate and injection time were kept constant in both groups. After examination, study subjects completed a digital questionnaire on different CM-related sensation items using digital visual analogue scales. Results: 253 consecutive patients were enrolled in a 6-month period. Most of the patients reported heat sensation in both groups (mean VAS: 5.3 mm in group A vs. 5.0 mm in group B, p = 0.5). Taste sensation also did not differ significantly between both groups (2.4 mm vs. 2.0 mm, p = 0.08). Pain sensation was reported to be significantly lower in group B patients (1.3 mm vs. 1.0 mm, p = 0.005), even though pain sensation in general was reported on a very low level. Other injection-related sensations were rarely reported. Conclusion: Patient-reported discomfort during intravenous injection of high-concentration contrast media (400 mg/ml) was low and only marginally different when compared to the injection of contrast media with a lower concentration. The injection of highly concentrated contrast media showed comparable overall patient acceptance, allowing a reduction of the injection speed and volume during examinations. Key points: · Patient-reported, contrast-related discomfort was very low in this study.. · High-concentration contrast media (HCCM) showed comparable overall patient acceptance.. · HCCM allow a reduction of injection speeds while keeping iodine flux constant.. Citation format: · Vahldiek JL, Schaafs LA, Niehues BK et al. Effect of Different Iodine Concentrations on Patient-Reported Discomfort in Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Prospective Comparative Trial. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 945 - 951.

Intradermal testing of iodinated contrast media: Should we test up to pure or with diluted compounds only?

Prevention and Treatment of Anaphylactoid Reaction to Ionic and Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Media

Skin Test Reactivity Patterns in Patients Allergic to Iodinated Contrast Media: A Refined View

The Potential Utility of Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM) Skin Testing in Patients with ICM Hypersensitivity

Effect of Different Iodine Concentrations on Patient-Reported Discomfort in Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Prospective Comparative Trial

Renal Tolerability of Iopromide and Iodixanol in 562 Renally Impaired Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterisation: the Direct Study

Acute Adverse Events After Iodinated Contrast Agent Administration of 359,977 Injections: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media despite drug prophylaxis-a comparative retrospective cohort study of breakthrough reactions in Bern (Switzerland) and Seoul (South Korea)

Shelling the myth: allergies to Iodine containing substances and risk of reaction to Iodinated contrast media

Evaluation of the acute adverse reaction of contrast medium with high and moderate iodine concentration in patients undergoing computed tomography

Comparative Safety Profiles and Usage Patterns of Iodinated Contrast Media in Medical Imaging

Impact of iodine concentration and iodine delivery rate on contrast enhancement in coronary CT angiography: a randomized multicenter trial (CT-CON)

Clinical follow-up in patients with moderate or severe allergic-like reactions to iodinated contrast material.

Contrast thresholds for detection of various iodine concentrations in subtraction CT and dual‐energy CT systems

Hypersensitivity Reactions Induced by Iodinated Contrast Media in Radiological Diagnosis: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS Database

Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors

PCD-CT enables contrast media reduction in abdominal imaging compared to an individualized kV-adapted contrast media injection protocol on EID-CT

A comparison of the use of contrast media with different iodine concentrations for enhanced computed tomography

Pharmacological Prevention of Hypersensitivity Reactions Caused by Iodinated Contrast Media: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Enhanced Differentiation of Amiodarone-Induced Thyrotoxicosis Types Using Semi-Quantitative 99mTc-MIBI Uptake Analysis: A Pilot Study

Radiographers' confidence in handling iodine based contrast media hypersensitivity reactions